Successful Transfer of a Vascularized Fibular Osteocutaneous Bone Graft Harvested Distal to a Previously Fractured Fibula
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
A literature search revealed one published case report in which a previously fractured fibula was used as a free vascularized fibular bone graft. The segment of fibula used was 3 cm proximal to the previous fracture site and was hypothesized to be within the “zone of injury.”1 Our case study, however, is the first report of a free vascularized fibular osteocutaneous transfer in which the fibula was harvested distal to a previous fracture and was therefore completely dependent on its periosteal, and not endosteal, blood supply. A 17-year-old boy sustained a grade IIIB open fracture of the left tibia and fibula (Fig. 1) and a closed fracture of the right tibia and fibula. After serial debridement, a 13-cm segmental tibial defect and a 15 × 8-cm soft-tissue defect (covered with a split-thickness skin graft) remained over the anteromedial aspect of the distal third of the lower leg.Fig. 1.: Grade IIIB open comminuted fracture of the left tibia and fibula.Eight months later, a vascularized free fibular osteocutaneous transfer, using the previously fractured right fibula, was performed. A portion of the flexor hallucis longus was left attached to the fibula to help preserve the periosteal circulation and fill the soft-tissue defect. A distal osteotomy was performed 6 cm proximal to the lateral malleolus, and the proximal osteotomy was made proximal to the fracture site. A 13-cm segment of fibula was harvested 3 cm distal to the previous, now-healed fibular fracture (Fig. 2). Examination of the proximal peroneal artery under the operating microscope showed no evidence of vascular intimal injury.Fig. 2.: Previously fractured, vascularized free fibular osteocutaneous graft.The fibula was then dowelled into the tibia and fixed with two cortical screws. End-to-side anastomosis of the peroneal artery to the recipient posterior tibial artery and end-to-end anastomosis of the peroneal venae comitantes to a posterior tibial vein were performed. Excellent blood flow was re-established to the fibula, flexor hallucis longus, and skin flap. The remaining soft-tissue defect was closed with a split-thickness skin graft. The skin flap showed excellent color and capillary refill and a strong Doppler signal throughout the postoperative course. The flap and split-thickness skin graft healed completely. Two years postoperatively, radiographs confirmed a solidly united tibia and the patient was ambulating pain-free (Fig. 3).Fig. 3.: Radiographs of the left tibia and fibula 2 years postoperatively (left, anteroposterior view; right, lateral view).This is the first report of successful transfer of a free vascularized fibular osteocutaneous bone graft in which the entire segment of fibula was harvested distal to a previous fracture. Previous fracture of the fibula may be associated with damage to its vascular supply and may jeopardize the viability of a vascularized free fibular bone graft. Normally, 70 percent of the cortex is supplied by the longitudinal endosteal circulation, which would become completely disrupted by a fracture of the fibula. The remaining 30 percent of cortical blood supply originates from the periosteum.2 When a free fibular transfer is performed several months after the initial injury, the fracture in the donor fibula will have healed, and it might be assumed that the cortical blood supply has been reconstituted. On the basis of this one case, we believe that, in rare circumstances, a free vascularized fibular osteocutaneous bone graft may be harvested distal to a healed previous fracture of the fibula without compromising its viability. ACKNOWLEDGMENT The authors thank Ryan Karlstad, M.D., clinical fellow, at the UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California. Ruby Grewal, M.D. Hand and Upper Limb Center London, Ontario, Canada Norman Y. Otsuka, M.D. Department of Orthopedic Surgery UCLA School of Medicine Shriners Hospital for Children Los Angeles, Calif. Neil F. Jones, M.D. Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department of Orthopedic Surgery UCLA School of Medicine Hand Surgery UCLA Medical Center Los Angeles, Calif.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».