MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Successful Transfer of a Vascularized Fibular Osteocutaneous Bone Graft Harvested Distal to a Previously Fractured Fibula

2007· article· en· W2052537062 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ruby Grewal, Norman Y. Otsuka, Neil F. Jones

Bibliographic record

VenuePlastic & Reconstructive Surgery · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone fractures and treatments
Canadian institutionsHand and Upper Limb Clinic
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFibulaMedicineTibiaSurgeryAnatomySoft tissue

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A literature search revealed one published case report in which a previously fractured fibula was used as a free vascularized fibular bone graft. The segment of fibula used was 3 cm proximal to the previous fracture site and was hypothesized to be within the “zone of injury.”1 Our case study, however, is the first report of a free vascularized fibular osteocutaneous transfer in which the fibula was harvested distal to a previous fracture and was therefore completely dependent on its periosteal, and not endosteal, blood supply. A 17-year-old boy sustained a grade IIIB open fracture of the left tibia and fibula (Fig. 1) and a closed fracture of the right tibia and fibula. After serial debridement, a 13-cm segmental tibial defect and a 15 × 8-cm soft-tissue defect (covered with a split-thickness skin graft) remained over the anteromedial aspect of the distal third of the lower leg.Fig. 1.: Grade IIIB open comminuted fracture of the left tibia and fibula.Eight months later, a vascularized free fibular osteocutaneous transfer, using the previously fractured right fibula, was performed. A portion of the flexor hallucis longus was left attached to the fibula to help preserve the periosteal circulation and fill the soft-tissue defect. A distal osteotomy was performed 6 cm proximal to the lateral malleolus, and the proximal osteotomy was made proximal to the fracture site. A 13-cm segment of fibula was harvested 3 cm distal to the previous, now-healed fibular fracture (Fig. 2). Examination of the proximal peroneal artery under the operating microscope showed no evidence of vascular intimal injury.Fig. 2.: Previously fractured, vascularized free fibular osteocutaneous graft.The fibula was then dowelled into the tibia and fixed with two cortical screws. End-to-side anastomosis of the peroneal artery to the recipient posterior tibial artery and end-to-end anastomosis of the peroneal venae comitantes to a posterior tibial vein were performed. Excellent blood flow was re-established to the fibula, flexor hallucis longus, and skin flap. The remaining soft-tissue defect was closed with a split-thickness skin graft. The skin flap showed excellent color and capillary refill and a strong Doppler signal throughout the postoperative course. The flap and split-thickness skin graft healed completely. Two years postoperatively, radiographs confirmed a solidly united tibia and the patient was ambulating pain-free (Fig. 3).Fig. 3.: Radiographs of the left tibia and fibula 2 years postoperatively (left, anteroposterior view; right, lateral view).This is the first report of successful transfer of a free vascularized fibular osteocutaneous bone graft in which the entire segment of fibula was harvested distal to a previous fracture. Previous fracture of the fibula may be associated with damage to its vascular supply and may jeopardize the viability of a vascularized free fibular bone graft. Normally, 70 percent of the cortex is supplied by the longitudinal endosteal circulation, which would become completely disrupted by a fracture of the fibula. The remaining 30 percent of cortical blood supply originates from the periosteum.2 When a free fibular transfer is performed several months after the initial injury, the fracture in the donor fibula will have healed, and it might be assumed that the cortical blood supply has been reconstituted. On the basis of this one case, we believe that, in rare circumstances, a free vascularized fibular osteocutaneous bone graft may be harvested distal to a healed previous fracture of the fibula without compromising its viability. ACKNOWLEDGMENT The authors thank Ryan Karlstad, M.D., clinical fellow, at the UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California. Ruby Grewal, M.D. Hand and Upper Limb Center London, Ontario, Canada Norman Y. Otsuka, M.D. Department of Orthopedic Surgery UCLA School of Medicine Shriners Hospital for Children Los Angeles, Calif. Neil F. Jones, M.D. Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department of Orthopedic Surgery UCLA School of Medicine Hand Surgery UCLA Medical Center Los Angeles, Calif.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.103
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlastic & Reconstructive SurgerySame topicBone fractures and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207