An evaluation of Canada’s engagement in Afghanistan
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Canada's engagement in Afghanistan, following in the wake of the United Statesled 7 October 2001 military invasion, has proven to be the most significant and closely observed Canadian international policy initiative since the Korean War. Over the past 12 years Ottawa has made a significant series of commitments to Afghanistan military, political, diplomatic, economic and social that have placed the Canadian Afghan relationship at the centre of Canadian external relations.The most prominent and visible component of that commitment has arguably been Canada's military involvement in Afghanistan. That involvement grew to upwards of 3000 members of the Canadian Forces1 deployed to Afghanistan, principally in Kabul and in Kandahar province. As a member of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) under the command of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), the Canadian military presence dramatically shifted from an emphasis on peacekeeping and logistical support to a direct combat role to a focus on training some 50,000 members of the Afghan National Army. This presence, however, has come at great cost in excess of 150 members of the Canadian Forces have died in the line of duty and more than 600 have been wounded in action.Beyond the actions of the Canadian Forces, Canada has sought to promote law and order in Afghanistan by training a wide variety of law enforcement officials in the country. Efforts have included having civilian and military police oversee the training of sizeable numbers (roughly 3000) of the Afghan National Police, corrections officers located in Kandahar, and officials with the Afghan National Customs Academy in Kabul.To aid in the effective administrative governance of Afghanistan, Canada has undertaken a variety of initiatives, including training, mentoring, and providing logistical support to strengthen the political role of local or community-based governance councils; providing direct administrative and financial oversight and training for key Afghan national ministries; directly assisting the fledgling Afghan electoral system, which included supporting the 2009 presidential and 2010 parliamentary elections; and working to identify and implement a series of confidencebuilding measures between Afghanistan and Pakistan, including the 2010 Afghanistan Pakistan Border Region Prosperity Initiative.Canadian economic and social contributions have also been wide-ranging. Pivotal to these efforts has been the reconstruction of the Dahla Dam and the Arghandab irrigation system (designed to foster sustainable agricultural output). The Government of Canada has also provided community economic development assistance (grants and loans) to foster existing and new business opportunities; built, repaired and expanded some 26 community-based schools; worked to develop curriculum, pedagogical training tools, and teacher training programs for the Afghan Ministry of Higher Education; provided valuable assistance to Kandahar University (including construction of a boundary wall, a women's dormitory, and a water well); extended vocational and literacy training to 30,000 Afghans; spearheaded a national polio vaccination campaign; trained 1500 healthcare workers; significantly contributed to the World Food Programme; and undertaken landmine elimination and training activities.The year 2011 marked a watershed for Canada's engagement with Afghanistan.2 The formerly wide range of commitments is now decidedly more limited in scope. Most notably, Canada's active combat role has concluded. Ottawa is now focused on the ongoing training of Afghan National Security Forces, regional diplomacy, education, health, and humanitarian assistance. Afghanistan, in other words, is now treated much like other developing nations to which Canada provides foreign aid.Focus of this issueThere is a distinct need, in the wake of the end of active Canadian military combat involvement in Afghanistan, to undertake a systematic review and assessment of the impact of Canada's engagement in Afghanistan across a full range of political, diplomatic, security, economic, and social indicators. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,010 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,008 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,015 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».