MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2054111834 · doi:10.1353/lan.2001.0105

<b>Terminologie de la traduction.</b> Ed. by Jean Delisle, Hannelorre Lee-Jahnke, and Monique C. Cormier Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1999. Pp. 433.

2001· article· fr· W2054111834 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gladys E. Saunders

Notice bibliographique

RevueLanguage · 2001
Typearticle
Languefr
DomaineArts and Humanities
Thématiquelinguistics and terminology studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGermanTerminologyLinguisticsEncyclopediaVocabularySection (typography)HumanitiesSociologyPhilosophyComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Terminologie de la traduction ed. by Jean Delisle, Hannelorre Leejahnke, and Monique C. Cormier Gladys E. Saunders Terminologie de la traduction. Ed. by Jean Delisle, Hannelorre Leejahnke, and Monique C. Cormier. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1999. Pp. 433. This terminology collection is written primarily for translators in training and their teachers and for authors of translation textbooks. But it can also be a useful tool for foreign language specialists, applied linguists, or anyone else having to describe translation phenomena. The work is more specialized and narrower in scope than other recently published books on translation vocabulary (such as Mark Shuttleworth and Moira Cowie’s Dictionary of translation studies, Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing, 1997, or the Routledge encyclopedia of translation studies, London: Routledge, 1998). While these latter attempt to cover all the concepts current in the field of translation studies, the present volume, by contrast, limits its coverage to approximately 200 key concepts, considered to be the most useful for teaching translation in four languages (French, English, Spanish, and German). Although this book is catalogued under its French title, the English, Spanish, and German equivalent titles do appear on the book cover. And while the terminology of each language group has been treated equally, one still senses that French is somehow the dominant language or source language of the collection. Indeed, the opening section (Part 1) is ‘Terminologie française’ (2–106), Part 2 ‘English terminology’ (107–212), Part 3 ‘Terminología española’ (213–322), and Part 4 ‘Deutsche Terminologie’ (323–433) follow. Each language section includes a four-page introduction, a list of signs and abbreviations, the dictionary articles (which vary in length from a few lines to a page or more), a dozen illustrative tables (designed to help the reader understand [End Page 411] the relationships between the concepts), and an end-bibliography (varying in length from three pages in the English section to nine pages in the German). The ultimate decision as to what constitutes membership in this specialized dictionary was made by a group of nearly twenty translation teachers and terminologists from universities in eight countries (Canada, France, Germany, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, the United States, and Venezuela). They chose the 200 key concepts which actually appear in the volume (from an original list of 1,419 terms, or 838 concepts, drawn up by Delisle and his collaborators in a preliminary study conducted on translation teaching handbooks). In elaborating the vocabulary the authors chose to follow the methodology originally established by the Office de la langue française, in Québec, in which term entries are established on the basis of concept systems and conceptual subfields. The concepts are rigorously defined; synonyms, quasisynonyms, orthographic variants, and abbreviations are listed; detailed notes and examples accompany the definitions to make the concepts easier to understand; and the terms in each section of the book are cross-listed. For instance, we note that ‘coinage’ (125) is synonymous with ‘coined term’; that it has been provided with two cross-references, ‘barbarism’ and ‘lacuna’; and that it is cross-listed with ‘mot forgé’ in French, ‘palabra creada’ in Spanish, and ‘ad hoc-Wortbildung’ in German. Recognizing that it would be impossible to maintain complete parallelism among the conceptual network of the four languages, the authors have adapted the terminology of each language group to the individual needs of the French, English, Spanish, and German linguistic communities, in accordance with their pedagogical practices and traditions (109). It is for this reason, to cite an example, that the French term ‘déterminants juxtaposés’ is cross-listed only with the Spanish term ‘predeterminantes’ (and vice versa); there is no parallel in English or German. The terms included here are used to describe distinct language events, the cognitive aspects involved in the translation process, the procedures involved in transfer from one language to another, and the results of these operations (109). A few well-known basic concepts from the adjacent fields of grammar, linguistics, and rhetoric are also included (e.g. aspect, contrastive linguistics, metaphor). While I find this book extremely useful, and will certainly recommend it to my students (who will be grateful to the authors for having assembled this collection...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,073
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,245

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0040,008
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,005
Communication savante0,0100,012
Science ouverte0,0020,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,006
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0730,071

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,257
Écart entre enseignants0,241 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2001
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueLanguageMême sujetlinguistics and terminology studiesTravaux en français237 207