MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2054159315 · doi:10.1353/utq.2007.0267

Must Write: Edna Staebler's Diaries (review)

2007· article· en· W2054159315 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Linda Warley

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIndependence (probability theory)Writing styleQuality (philosophy)LiteratureHistoryMedia studiesArtSociologyPhilosophyEpistemology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Must Write: Edna Staebler’s Diaries Linda Warley (bio) Edna Staebler. Must Write: Edna Staebler’s Diaries. Edited by Christl Verduyn Wilfrid Laurier University Press. viii, 303. $24.95 Scholars interested in Canadian life writing will welcome the publication of this selection of Edna Staebler's diaries. A short example of her diaries was previously published in Kathryn Carter's 2002 collection The Small Details of Life: Twenty Diaries by Women in Canada, 1830–1996, but the archive (held at the University of Guelph) is large. Readers may think of Staebler as a folksy writer of cookbooks, creative non-fiction, and journalistic pieces, but the diaries reveal a woman and author of considerable depth, subtlety, and complexity. Arguably, the diaries are her major literary achievement and not only because of their sheer volume – Staebler kept a diary for eight decades – but also because of the quality of the writing. Her previously published writing tends to be realist, and it has perhaps been undervalued in a critical milieu in which formal experimentation is lauded. Staebler's writing style suits the diary genre perfectly: there is a liveliness and wit to the prose, as well as a subjective complexity shaped, which engage the reader. The topics she addresses are intrinsically interesting. For instance, for a woman of her generation and upbringing she is remarkably frank about her need for independence – from family and from men – and for sexual and intellectual fulfilment. The diaries reveal a strong feminist who pulled against the constraints of her society: 'This business of being married and doing nothing with a brain, which may or may not be any good, is too, too awful.' She is scathing in her comments about her difficult marriage to an alcoholic and unfaithful husband. And she is thoughtful about her own aging process. At times her tone is philosophical; at other times playful, even funny. As the title suggests, the thematic focus of this volume is Staebler's desire to write, both to express herself and to be a published author. The 'must' in the title is a mark of that unfailing passion; it is also a directive [End Page 564] she issues to herself. Recurring fears that she does not write often enough, well enough, or consistently enough seem to have plagued her. No doubt Staebler's obsessive focus on her writing is heightened, perhaps even exaggerated, by the editor's selection practice. The singular focus can make for repetitive, potentially boring reading. Certainly, one longs to know more about other matters that shaped Staebler's life and identity, especially her personal relationships. Men other than her husband are mentioned but we don't know if Staebler wrote much about her feelings for them. There is very little about Staebler's parents or sisters or the family's long and deep involvement in the Kitchener-Waterloo area. There are many other threads to pull from the diaries, and one can only hope that in the future Christl Verduyn or other scholars will undertake the considerable task of reading, transcribing, editing, and publishing more of them. Included in Must Write are four of Staebler's journalistic pieces, numerous photographs, a chronology of the author's life, a family tree, and a few reproductions of the diary pages themselves. Verduyn also supplies invaluable contextual material through brief introductions to each chapter and through endnotes. At the end of the book is a helpful bibliography. Verduyn opens the volume with a cogent (if brief) essay in which she locates Staebler's diaries in historical and critical contexts. Especially important is the discussion of theoretical work in the area of women's life writing. This theoretical context provides a framework through which to analyse autobiographical self-representation in the diaries. Readers are obviously interested in the facts of Staebler's life, but just as important is the way she shapes her identity through language. The inclusion of this extratextual material makes Must Write a thoroughly scholarly edition. Verduyn has honoured Staebler's writing achievements; she has also made an important contribution to Canadian life-writing studies by bringing to a wider audience a significant primary text. Linda Warley Linda Warley, Department of English...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,991
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,380

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,024
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0060,007
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0050,003
Science ouverte0,0030,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,1130,091

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,211
Écart entre enseignants0,204 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2007
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly→Même sujetCanadian Identity and History→Travaux en français237 207→