MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2054159315 · doi:10.1353/utq.2007.0267

Must Write: Edna Staebler's Diaries (review)

2007· article· en· W2054159315 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Linda Warley

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndependence (probability theory)Writing styleQuality (philosophy)LiteratureHistoryMedia studiesArtSociologyPhilosophyEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Must Write: Edna Staebler’s Diaries Linda Warley (bio) Edna Staebler. Must Write: Edna Staebler’s Diaries. Edited by Christl Verduyn Wilfrid Laurier University Press. viii, 303. $24.95 Scholars interested in Canadian life writing will welcome the publication of this selection of Edna Staebler's diaries. A short example of her diaries was previously published in Kathryn Carter's 2002 collection The Small Details of Life: Twenty Diaries by Women in Canada, 1830–1996, but the archive (held at the University of Guelph) is large. Readers may think of Staebler as a folksy writer of cookbooks, creative non-fiction, and journalistic pieces, but the diaries reveal a woman and author of considerable depth, subtlety, and complexity. Arguably, the diaries are her major literary achievement and not only because of their sheer volume – Staebler kept a diary for eight decades – but also because of the quality of the writing. Her previously published writing tends to be realist, and it has perhaps been undervalued in a critical milieu in which formal experimentation is lauded. Staebler's writing style suits the diary genre perfectly: there is a liveliness and wit to the prose, as well as a subjective complexity shaped, which engage the reader. The topics she addresses are intrinsically interesting. For instance, for a woman of her generation and upbringing she is remarkably frank about her need for independence – from family and from men – and for sexual and intellectual fulfilment. The diaries reveal a strong feminist who pulled against the constraints of her society: 'This business of being married and doing nothing with a brain, which may or may not be any good, is too, too awful.' She is scathing in her comments about her difficult marriage to an alcoholic and unfaithful husband. And she is thoughtful about her own aging process. At times her tone is philosophical; at other times playful, even funny. As the title suggests, the thematic focus of this volume is Staebler's desire to write, both to express herself and to be a published author. The 'must' in the title is a mark of that unfailing passion; it is also a directive [End Page 564] she issues to herself. Recurring fears that she does not write often enough, well enough, or consistently enough seem to have plagued her. No doubt Staebler's obsessive focus on her writing is heightened, perhaps even exaggerated, by the editor's selection practice. The singular focus can make for repetitive, potentially boring reading. Certainly, one longs to know more about other matters that shaped Staebler's life and identity, especially her personal relationships. Men other than her husband are mentioned but we don't know if Staebler wrote much about her feelings for them. There is very little about Staebler's parents or sisters or the family's long and deep involvement in the Kitchener-Waterloo area. There are many other threads to pull from the diaries, and one can only hope that in the future Christl Verduyn or other scholars will undertake the considerable task of reading, transcribing, editing, and publishing more of them. Included in Must Write are four of Staebler's journalistic pieces, numerous photographs, a chronology of the author's life, a family tree, and a few reproductions of the diary pages themselves. Verduyn also supplies invaluable contextual material through brief introductions to each chapter and through endnotes. At the end of the book is a helpful bibliography. Verduyn opens the volume with a cogent (if brief) essay in which she locates Staebler's diaries in historical and critical contexts. Especially important is the discussion of theoretical work in the area of women's life writing. This theoretical context provides a framework through which to analyse autobiographical self-representation in the diaries. Readers are obviously interested in the facts of Staebler's life, but just as important is the way she shapes her identity through language. The inclusion of this extratextual material makes Must Write a thoroughly scholarly edition. Verduyn has honoured Staebler's writing achievements; she has also made an important contribution to Canadian life-writing studies by bringing to a wider audience a significant primary text. Linda Warley Linda Warley, Department of English...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score0.380

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1130.091

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly→Same topicCanadian Identity and History→French-language works237,207→