In the Midst of Alarms: The Untold Story of Women and the War of 1812 (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: In the Midst of Alarms: The Untold Story of Women and the War of 1812 Katherine M.J. McKenna In the Midst of Alarms: The Untold Story of Women and the War of 1812. By Dianne Graves. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: Robin Brass, 2007. ISBN 978-1-896941-52-3. Maps. Illustrations. Appendixes. Notes. Bibliography. Index. Pp. xv, 496. CAN$39.95. This is a lively account of the history of women during the time of the War of 1812 on both sides of the 49th parallel. As such, it will have a broad appeal for the general reader. The author's work is based on extensive research which, for the most part, is well documented and assiduously footnoted. A hefty read at almost 500 pages, it includes not only thirteen chapters and an epilogue, but appendices on food, recipes, gardening and proper conduct for ladies. Much of the book is not on women in the War of 1812 itself, but rather on women in the era of the war. The first eight chapters, comprising over 250 pages, examine women's roles within marriage and the family, private and public labour, social life and the more particular [End Page 1296] situation of women married to military personnel of both higher and lower ranks in the first part of the Nineteenth Century. The author relates what must be hundreds of stories about women ranging from Quebec, British North America, the northern and southern regions of the United States and even England. The amount of detail and, at times, the lack of differentiation amongst these women, can be a bit overwhelming. The author's pace quickens, however, as she reaches the core of her story – the accounts of women during the war itself. The strongest chapter in the book is the ninth one, which deals with the horrible fates of many women and children on both sides of the border in the Northern Theatre. These harrowing and dramatic tales remind us that we only hear one side of the story of war when we focus on the strictly military perspective. As interesting as these stories are, this is not a book that pushes forward the boundaries of women's and gender history. Dianne Graves avoids engaging with the existing scholarly work in the field, which would have provided her with an interpretive framework. She hastens to assure the reader that she has "not written from a feminist perspective," which to her means, "imposing a modern context on the past" (p. xi). Yet it is she who falls into that trap, seeing, for example, women's forced responsibilities during the war in their husbands' absence as, "yet another milestone along the long road that would lead eventually to emancipation" (p. 57). Occasionally, the author relies on local anecdotal sources that can lead to factual errors. One example is the romantic story of Mary Powell grieving over her betrothed John Macdonell who died at the Battle of Queenston Heights (p. 357). My own published work shows that, in fact, Mary rejected John's advances. On a couple of occasions the author's partiality to certain characters gets the better of her, as when she euphemistically describes Dolley Madison's slaves as "loyal African-Americans" (p. 310). These caveats, although of concern to the academic historian, will not and should not take away from the enjoyment that the general reader will find in these fascinating stories about women in the era of the War of 1812. Katherine M.J. McKenna University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada Copyright © 2008 Society for Military History
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,008 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».