MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2056693427 · doi:10.1353/jmh.0.0129

In the Midst of Alarms: The Untold Story of Women and the War of 1812 (review)

2008· article· en· W2056693427 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Katherine McKenna

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Journal of Military History · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHistoryLiteratureArt

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: In the Midst of Alarms: The Untold Story of Women and the War of 1812 Katherine M.J. McKenna In the Midst of Alarms: The Untold Story of Women and the War of 1812. By Dianne Graves. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: Robin Brass, 2007. ISBN 978-1-896941-52-3. Maps. Illustrations. Appendixes. Notes. Bibliography. Index. Pp. xv, 496. CAN$39.95. This is a lively account of the history of women during the time of the War of 1812 on both sides of the 49th parallel. As such, it will have a broad appeal for the general reader. The author's work is based on extensive research which, for the most part, is well documented and assiduously footnoted. A hefty read at almost 500 pages, it includes not only thirteen chapters and an epilogue, but appendices on food, recipes, gardening and proper conduct for ladies. Much of the book is not on women in the War of 1812 itself, but rather on women in the era of the war. The first eight chapters, comprising over 250 pages, examine women's roles within marriage and the family, private and public labour, social life and the more particular [End Page 1296] situation of women married to military personnel of both higher and lower ranks in the first part of the Nineteenth Century. The author relates what must be hundreds of stories about women ranging from Quebec, British North America, the northern and southern regions of the United States and even England. The amount of detail and, at times, the lack of differentiation amongst these women, can be a bit overwhelming. The author's pace quickens, however, as she reaches the core of her story – the accounts of women during the war itself. The strongest chapter in the book is the ninth one, which deals with the horrible fates of many women and children on both sides of the border in the Northern Theatre. These harrowing and dramatic tales remind us that we only hear one side of the story of war when we focus on the strictly military perspective. As interesting as these stories are, this is not a book that pushes forward the boundaries of women's and gender history. Dianne Graves avoids engaging with the existing scholarly work in the field, which would have provided her with an interpretive framework. She hastens to assure the reader that she has "not written from a feminist perspective," which to her means, "imposing a modern context on the past" (p. xi). Yet it is she who falls into that trap, seeing, for example, women's forced responsibilities during the war in their husbands' absence as, "yet another milestone along the long road that would lead eventually to emancipation" (p. 57). Occasionally, the author relies on local anecdotal sources that can lead to factual errors. One example is the romantic story of Mary Powell grieving over her betrothed John Macdonell who died at the Battle of Queenston Heights (p. 357). My own published work shows that, in fact, Mary rejected John's advances. On a couple of occasions the author's partiality to certain characters gets the better of her, as when she euphemistically describes Dolley Madison's slaves as "loyal African-Americans" (p. 310). These caveats, although of concern to the academic historian, will not and should not take away from the enjoyment that the general reader will find in these fascinating stories about women in the era of the War of 1812. Katherine M.J. McKenna University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada Copyright © 2008 Society for Military History

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,006
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,552
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,995

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0060,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,008
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,252
Écart entre enseignants0,233 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2008
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Journal of Military HistoryMême sujetAmerican Constitutional Law and PoliticsTravaux en français237 207