MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2056693427 · doi:10.1353/jmh.0.0129

In the Midst of Alarms: The Untold Story of Women and the War of 1812 (review)

2008· article· en· W2056693427 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Katherine McKenna

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Military History · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoryLiteratureArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: In the Midst of Alarms: The Untold Story of Women and the War of 1812 Katherine M.J. McKenna In the Midst of Alarms: The Untold Story of Women and the War of 1812. By Dianne Graves. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: Robin Brass, 2007. ISBN 978-1-896941-52-3. Maps. Illustrations. Appendixes. Notes. Bibliography. Index. Pp. xv, 496. CAN$39.95. This is a lively account of the history of women during the time of the War of 1812 on both sides of the 49th parallel. As such, it will have a broad appeal for the general reader. The author's work is based on extensive research which, for the most part, is well documented and assiduously footnoted. A hefty read at almost 500 pages, it includes not only thirteen chapters and an epilogue, but appendices on food, recipes, gardening and proper conduct for ladies. Much of the book is not on women in the War of 1812 itself, but rather on women in the era of the war. The first eight chapters, comprising over 250 pages, examine women's roles within marriage and the family, private and public labour, social life and the more particular [End Page 1296] situation of women married to military personnel of both higher and lower ranks in the first part of the Nineteenth Century. The author relates what must be hundreds of stories about women ranging from Quebec, British North America, the northern and southern regions of the United States and even England. The amount of detail and, at times, the lack of differentiation amongst these women, can be a bit overwhelming. The author's pace quickens, however, as she reaches the core of her story – the accounts of women during the war itself. The strongest chapter in the book is the ninth one, which deals with the horrible fates of many women and children on both sides of the border in the Northern Theatre. These harrowing and dramatic tales remind us that we only hear one side of the story of war when we focus on the strictly military perspective. As interesting as these stories are, this is not a book that pushes forward the boundaries of women's and gender history. Dianne Graves avoids engaging with the existing scholarly work in the field, which would have provided her with an interpretive framework. She hastens to assure the reader that she has "not written from a feminist perspective," which to her means, "imposing a modern context on the past" (p. xi). Yet it is she who falls into that trap, seeing, for example, women's forced responsibilities during the war in their husbands' absence as, "yet another milestone along the long road that would lead eventually to emancipation" (p. 57). Occasionally, the author relies on local anecdotal sources that can lead to factual errors. One example is the romantic story of Mary Powell grieving over her betrothed John Macdonell who died at the Battle of Queenston Heights (p. 357). My own published work shows that, in fact, Mary rejected John's advances. On a couple of occasions the author's partiality to certain characters gets the better of her, as when she euphemistically describes Dolley Madison's slaves as "loyal African-Americans" (p. 310). These caveats, although of concern to the academic historian, will not and should not take away from the enjoyment that the general reader will find in these fascinating stories about women in the era of the War of 1812. Katherine M.J. McKenna University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada Copyright © 2008 Society for Military History

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Military HistorySame topicAmerican Constitutional Law and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207