MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2057073710 · doi:10.1353/rhe.2013.0005

Higher Education in a Global Society (review)

2012· article· en· W2057073710 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Josephine Sahaya

Notice bibliographique

RevueReview of higher education/˜The œreview of higher education · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueHigher Education Governance and Development
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGlobalizationInternationalizationHigher educationPolitical scienceCommercializationManagementSociologyEconomicsLawInternational trade

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Higher Education in a Global Society Josephine Sahaya D. Bruce Johnstone, Madeleine B. D’Ambrosio, and Paul J. Yakoboski (Eds). Higher Education in a Global Society. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2010. 215 pp. Cloth: $99.00. ISBN: 978-1-8484-4752-3. Higher Education in a Global Society emerged from the proceedings of a higher education leadership conference hosted by Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association—College Retirement Equities Fund (TIAA-CREF) in November 2008. The conference focused on creating cross-cultural understanding, constructing global collaborations and fortifying worldwide economies. Participants included presidents, chancellors, higher education researchers, thought leaders, senior management of TIAA-CREF, and senior campus officials. This book distills their concerns, challenges, and prospects for promoting globalized and internationalized higher education. As a whole, the book provides a rich understanding of the concepts of globalization and massification of higher education. Its chapters inventory various internationalization strategies adopted by colleges and universities in the United States. These include study-abroad programs, the recruitment of international students, cross-border education offerings, research collaborations, and faculty involvement in internationalization. The first three chapters approach globalization broadly, offering rationales, definitions, and typologies. In Chapter 1, Bruce Johnstone discusses the significance of globalization to American higher education. He provides several scholars’ definitions of globalization and isolates the difference between internationalization and globalization. Johnstone elucidates how in a globalized world, economic wealth flows from knowledge as opposed to natural resources. Hence, the wealth of nations in a global economy increasingly emerges from the commercialization of knowledge, universities and research centers, scholars, an educated labor force, a suitable system of education, and workforce training. While reinforcing American higher education practices, Johnstone simultaneously observes that the United States may learn much from the European Union education scenario. He closes the chapter by presenting the challenges that higher education leaders face in an increasingly globalized world. Chapters 2 and 3 closely relate, introducing the phenomenon of the massification of higher education, and the emergence and growth of cross-border education as a response. Philip G. Altbach, in Chapter 2, explains massification as the movement from small to very large enrollments in colleges and universities, and from elite to mass participation in higher education across society. Altbach enumerates both the benefits and concerns that arise from expanding enrollment growth. Jane Knight, in Chapter 3, explains cross-border education as “the movement of people, programs, providers, knowledge, ideas, projects, values, curriculum, policy and services across national boundaries” (p. 47). Knight typologizes these strategies, provides a framework for understanding their differences, examines their impact, and touches on their associated challenges. The next seven chapters present observations and case studies of various specific internationalization strategies. Elizabeth Capaldi, in Chapter 4, reflects on the need to increase international research collaborations to solve global problems. She discusses the roles of the government and international corporations in promoting such collaborations, as well as legal and regulatory issues and cultural considerations. [End Page 290] Mark Kamlet, in Chapter 5, describes Carnegie Mellon University’s successful experience in implementing and sustaining cross border education in undergraduate and graduate education. Peter McPherson and Margaret Heisel, in Chapter 6, focus attention on study-abroad programs, arguing the need for students to gain a global perspective to ensure America’s economic well-being and social and political security. They discuss the influence of the Abraham Lincoln Study Abroad Commission, established by Congress in 2004, which addressed this very issue and developed a framework for postsecondary international study. The authors also discuss the growth in study-abroad programs, variations in their format and duration, the challenges facing these programs, and the need for study abroad to emerge as a field of research. Kathleen Waldron, in Chapter 7, offers Baruch College of the City University of New York as an example of how to create international experiences domestically. She examines the design and implementation of Baruch’s global student certificate program that provides students with an international experience without leaving the campus. Chapters 8 and 9 address the importance of faculty involvement in creating a more globally oriented campus. Patti McGill Peterson, in Chapter 8, discusses barriers blocking faculty involvement. They include the faculty’s focus on their respective...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,163
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0160,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,386
Écart entre enseignants0,366 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueReview of higher education/˜The œreview of higher educationMême sujetHigher Education Governance and DevelopmentTravaux en français237 207