MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2057073710 · doi:10.1353/rhe.2013.0005

Higher Education in a Global Society (review)

2012· article· en· W2057073710 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Josephine Sahaya

Bibliographic record

VenueReview of higher education/˜The œreview of higher education · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHigher Education Governance and Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlobalizationInternationalizationHigher educationPolitical scienceCommercializationManagementSociologyEconomicsLawInternational trade

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Higher Education in a Global Society Josephine Sahaya D. Bruce Johnstone, Madeleine B. D’Ambrosio, and Paul J. Yakoboski (Eds). Higher Education in a Global Society. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2010. 215 pp. Cloth: $99.00. ISBN: 978-1-8484-4752-3. Higher Education in a Global Society emerged from the proceedings of a higher education leadership conference hosted by Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association—College Retirement Equities Fund (TIAA-CREF) in November 2008. The conference focused on creating cross-cultural understanding, constructing global collaborations and fortifying worldwide economies. Participants included presidents, chancellors, higher education researchers, thought leaders, senior management of TIAA-CREF, and senior campus officials. This book distills their concerns, challenges, and prospects for promoting globalized and internationalized higher education. As a whole, the book provides a rich understanding of the concepts of globalization and massification of higher education. Its chapters inventory various internationalization strategies adopted by colleges and universities in the United States. These include study-abroad programs, the recruitment of international students, cross-border education offerings, research collaborations, and faculty involvement in internationalization. The first three chapters approach globalization broadly, offering rationales, definitions, and typologies. In Chapter 1, Bruce Johnstone discusses the significance of globalization to American higher education. He provides several scholars’ definitions of globalization and isolates the difference between internationalization and globalization. Johnstone elucidates how in a globalized world, economic wealth flows from knowledge as opposed to natural resources. Hence, the wealth of nations in a global economy increasingly emerges from the commercialization of knowledge, universities and research centers, scholars, an educated labor force, a suitable system of education, and workforce training. While reinforcing American higher education practices, Johnstone simultaneously observes that the United States may learn much from the European Union education scenario. He closes the chapter by presenting the challenges that higher education leaders face in an increasingly globalized world. Chapters 2 and 3 closely relate, introducing the phenomenon of the massification of higher education, and the emergence and growth of cross-border education as a response. Philip G. Altbach, in Chapter 2, explains massification as the movement from small to very large enrollments in colleges and universities, and from elite to mass participation in higher education across society. Altbach enumerates both the benefits and concerns that arise from expanding enrollment growth. Jane Knight, in Chapter 3, explains cross-border education as “the movement of people, programs, providers, knowledge, ideas, projects, values, curriculum, policy and services across national boundaries” (p. 47). Knight typologizes these strategies, provides a framework for understanding their differences, examines their impact, and touches on their associated challenges. The next seven chapters present observations and case studies of various specific internationalization strategies. Elizabeth Capaldi, in Chapter 4, reflects on the need to increase international research collaborations to solve global problems. She discusses the roles of the government and international corporations in promoting such collaborations, as well as legal and regulatory issues and cultural considerations. [End Page 290] Mark Kamlet, in Chapter 5, describes Carnegie Mellon University’s successful experience in implementing and sustaining cross border education in undergraduate and graduate education. Peter McPherson and Margaret Heisel, in Chapter 6, focus attention on study-abroad programs, arguing the need for students to gain a global perspective to ensure America’s economic well-being and social and political security. They discuss the influence of the Abraham Lincoln Study Abroad Commission, established by Congress in 2004, which addressed this very issue and developed a framework for postsecondary international study. The authors also discuss the growth in study-abroad programs, variations in their format and duration, the challenges facing these programs, and the need for study abroad to emerge as a field of research. Kathleen Waldron, in Chapter 7, offers Baruch College of the City University of New York as an example of how to create international experiences domestically. She examines the design and implementation of Baruch’s global student certificate program that provides students with an international experience without leaving the campus. Chapters 8 and 9 address the importance of faculty involvement in creating a more globally oriented campus. Patti McGill Peterson, in Chapter 8, discusses barriers blocking faculty involvement. They include the faculty’s focus on their respective...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.097

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.366 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReview of higher education/˜The œreview of higher educationSame topicHigher Education Governance and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207