MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2057233882 · doi:10.1353/cat.2018.0020

Report of the Editor

2018· article· en· W2057233882 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nelson H. Minnich

Notice bibliographique

Revue˜The œCatholic historical review · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueReformation and Early Modern Christianity
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTheme (computing)ChapelClassicsHistoryGermanNoticeIndex (typography)Library scienceArt historyPolitical scienceLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Report of the Editor Nelson H. Minnich Volume 103 of the journal consisted of 846 pages of articles, addresses, essays, book reviews, brief notices, and the quarterly sections Notes and Comments, Periodical Literature, and Other Books Received, with an additional twenty pages of preliminary material and forty-six pages of the general index. In all, Volume 103 contained 912 pages. Subsidies from authors and contributions from others made directly to the journal allowed for the addition of pages above those budgeted. Dr. Paul F. Grendler of Chapel Hill, NC (emeritus of the University of Toronto) and the Reverend Robert C. Ayres of Cazenovia, N.Y., have made generous contributions. Of the eighteen regular articles and two addresses published, three treated a medieval topic, six early modern European, three late modern European, seven American, and one a modern ecumenical theme. Fourteen of their authors came from American institutions, the others from Canadian, German, Italian, Maltese, Polish, and Portuguese universities. In addition, there was a Forum Essay dealing with a book on the early modern period that had contributions by scholars from Canadian, Italian, and American institutions. In 2017, the journal published 150 book reviews and one brief notice. The book reviews can be subdivided into the following categories: general and miscellaneous (14), ancient (11), medieval (34), early modern (44), late modern (20), American (21), Latin American (5), and Canadian (2). In addition, there was a review of a film treating an early modern missions theme (1). Their authors came mostly from institutions in the United States (93 or 62%), but those in other countries were also represented: in the United Kingdom (25 or 16%), Canada (10 or 7%), Italy (8 or 5%), Germany (3 or 2%), two each from Australia and France, and one each from Austria, Belgium, Chile, Croatia, Cyprus, Greece, Ireland, Spain, and Sweden. One brief notice and the review of the film were by authors at institutions in the United States. Please see Table 1. The editors received thirty-four new submissions of articles in 2017. They came primarily from the United States, but also from Australia, Canada, Chile, Croatia, the Czeck Republic, Korea/Japan, Russia, Tanzania, and the United Kingdom. Table 2 shows the current disposition of these submissions. During the year 2017, seventeen articles earlier accepted were published. Two articles received awards during 2017. The Peter Guilday Prize for the best article that was the first scholarly article published by an author went to Ms. Kathleen Walkowiak for her study "Public Authority and Private Constraints: Eugenius III and the Council of Reims" (pp. 409–36). A new prize, anonymously donated recently and entitled the Nelson H. Minnich Award was granted to Dr. [End Page 162] Carolyn Salmons for her article "A Church United in Itself: Hernando de Talavera and the Religious Culture of Fifteenth-Century Castile" (pp. 639–62), deemed by the prize committee to be the best article to appear in the journal in 2017. Click for larger view View full resolution Table 1. Book Reviews, Film Review, and Brief Notice Published in 2017 Click for larger view View full resolution Table 2. Manuscripts Submitted in 2017 During 2017 the journal experienced staffing problems. With the departure in November of Ms. Elizabeth Foxwell as staff editor, a search for her replacement took four months to find an appropriate candidate. Ms. Mary Tonkinson filled in for a couple months but then also left. Mr. Richard Lender subsequently helped out. We appreciate everyone's patience and understanding during this period of [End Page 163] transition. The editor is most appreciative of their services and those provided by the associate editors Msgr. Robert Trisco and Dr. Jennifer Paxton, by the graduate assistant Ms. Katya Mouris, and by the Board of Advisory Editors. The journal could not function without their continued dedicated services. [End Page 164] Copyright © 2018 The Catholic University of America Press

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,646
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,041
Tête enseignante GPT0,262
Écart entre enseignants0,221 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revue˜The œCatholic historical reviewMême sujetReformation and Early Modern ChristianityTravaux en français237 207