MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2057233882 · doi:10.1353/cat.2018.0020

Report of the Editor

2018· article· en· W2057233882 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nelson H. Minnich

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œCatholic historical review · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicReformation and Early Modern Christianity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTheme (computing)ChapelClassicsHistoryGermanNoticeIndex (typography)Library scienceArt historyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Report of the Editor Nelson H. Minnich Volume 103 of the journal consisted of 846 pages of articles, addresses, essays, book reviews, brief notices, and the quarterly sections Notes and Comments, Periodical Literature, and Other Books Received, with an additional twenty pages of preliminary material and forty-six pages of the general index. In all, Volume 103 contained 912 pages. Subsidies from authors and contributions from others made directly to the journal allowed for the addition of pages above those budgeted. Dr. Paul F. Grendler of Chapel Hill, NC (emeritus of the University of Toronto) and the Reverend Robert C. Ayres of Cazenovia, N.Y., have made generous contributions. Of the eighteen regular articles and two addresses published, three treated a medieval topic, six early modern European, three late modern European, seven American, and one a modern ecumenical theme. Fourteen of their authors came from American institutions, the others from Canadian, German, Italian, Maltese, Polish, and Portuguese universities. In addition, there was a Forum Essay dealing with a book on the early modern period that had contributions by scholars from Canadian, Italian, and American institutions. In 2017, the journal published 150 book reviews and one brief notice. The book reviews can be subdivided into the following categories: general and miscellaneous (14), ancient (11), medieval (34), early modern (44), late modern (20), American (21), Latin American (5), and Canadian (2). In addition, there was a review of a film treating an early modern missions theme (1). Their authors came mostly from institutions in the United States (93 or 62%), but those in other countries were also represented: in the United Kingdom (25 or 16%), Canada (10 or 7%), Italy (8 or 5%), Germany (3 or 2%), two each from Australia and France, and one each from Austria, Belgium, Chile, Croatia, Cyprus, Greece, Ireland, Spain, and Sweden. One brief notice and the review of the film were by authors at institutions in the United States. Please see Table 1. The editors received thirty-four new submissions of articles in 2017. They came primarily from the United States, but also from Australia, Canada, Chile, Croatia, the Czeck Republic, Korea/Japan, Russia, Tanzania, and the United Kingdom. Table 2 shows the current disposition of these submissions. During the year 2017, seventeen articles earlier accepted were published. Two articles received awards during 2017. The Peter Guilday Prize for the best article that was the first scholarly article published by an author went to Ms. Kathleen Walkowiak for her study "Public Authority and Private Constraints: Eugenius III and the Council of Reims" (pp. 409–36). A new prize, anonymously donated recently and entitled the Nelson H. Minnich Award was granted to Dr. [End Page 162] Carolyn Salmons for her article "A Church United in Itself: Hernando de Talavera and the Religious Culture of Fifteenth-Century Castile" (pp. 639–62), deemed by the prize committee to be the best article to appear in the journal in 2017. Click for larger view View full resolution Table 1. Book Reviews, Film Review, and Brief Notice Published in 2017 Click for larger view View full resolution Table 2. Manuscripts Submitted in 2017 During 2017 the journal experienced staffing problems. With the departure in November of Ms. Elizabeth Foxwell as staff editor, a search for her replacement took four months to find an appropriate candidate. Ms. Mary Tonkinson filled in for a couple months but then also left. Mr. Richard Lender subsequently helped out. We appreciate everyone's patience and understanding during this period of [End Page 163] transition. The editor is most appreciative of their services and those provided by the associate editors Msgr. Robert Trisco and Dr. Jennifer Paxton, by the graduate assistant Ms. Katya Mouris, and by the Board of Advisory Editors. The journal could not function without their continued dedicated services. [End Page 164] Copyright © 2018 The Catholic University of America Press

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.646
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œCatholic historical reviewSame topicReformation and Early Modern ChristianityFrench-language works237,207