MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2058508732 · doi:10.1037/a0025549

Canadian counselling psychologists' contributions to applied psychology.

2011· article· en· W2058508732 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ada L. Sinacore, William A. Borgen, Judith C. Daniluk, Anusha Kassan, Bonita C. Long, Jennifer J. Nicol

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCareer Development and Diversity
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPsychologyApplied psychologySchool psychologyPsychotherapist

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The goal of this paper is to draw attention to the contributions of Canadian counselling psychologists in three key areas central to the discipline: (a) multiculturalism, social justice, and advocacy; (b) health, wellness, and prevention, and (c) career psychology. Accordingly, we have situated our discussion within a historical framework of the discipline followed by a discussion of the Canadian context, definitions, and specific contributions. Finally, we offer a summary of the strengths and current challenges faced by Canadian counselling psychologists. Keywords: counselling psychology, multiculturalism, health, career In this article we highlight the unique contributions of Canadian counselling psychology to the broader field of applied psychology. To accomplish this, we focus primarily on works authored by Canadian counselling psychologists. In particular, we begin by providing a brief overview of multiculturalism, social justice, and advocacy, wherein we discuss the unique Canadian context within which the discipline of counselling psychology resides. As well, we review the literature on three populations that Canadian counselling psychologists have studied, namely aboriginal peoples, immigrants, and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and trans (LGBT) people. We follow this review with a discussion of the multicultural competency literature and the emerging social justice paradigm in the discipline. In keeping with the multicultural framework presented in the first section, we provide a discussion of the vast health-related research conducted by Canadian counsellors and counselling psychologists, and identify their unique contributions. In particular, we categorise these works under the headings of health, wellness, and prevention. To ensure clarity, we offer our current definitions of these three headings. This section is followed by a discussion of the occupation, vocation, and career development literature, wherein we reflect upon the evolution of these areas within the context of career and counselling psychology in Canada. Specifically, we offer current definitions for widely used terms in this domain of the field. In addition, we offer our conceptualisation of career development as psychological transition. Next, to conclude, we briefly discuss the methodological frameworks used in all of these areas of research. Finally, we offer our summary of the strengths and current challenges faced by Canadian counselling psychologists doing all of this important work. Multiculturalism, Social Justice, and Advocacy We begin our overview in the areas of multiculturalism, social justice, and advocacy in Canadian counselling psychology noting that, historically, the discipline of counselling psychology, and the multicultural movement therein, was founded in the United States (Young & Nicol, 2007). As a result, Canadian counselling psychologists have largely relied on the United States' infrastructure, including, but not limited to, American publication outlets (e.g., Journal of Counseling Psychology). Thus, to highlight Canadian counselling psychology research, we will both refer to the foundational American work from which this research emanated as well as the body of scholarship Canadian authors have published both in Canada and the United States. Nevertheless, Canadian counselling psychology has an approach to diversity and multiculturalism that is distinct from that of its American counterparts (Lalande, 2004). In fact, Canada is historically and increasingly a culturally diverse nation with a longstanding policy of multiculturalism, which encourages individuals to maintain their cultural backgrounds while sharing in the common Canadian experience (Berry, 1984). In fact, Canada's first official policy pertaining to multiculturalism dates back to the early 1970s. The Official Languages Act and, later, the Multiculturalism Within a Bilingual Framework were initiated in response both to French Canadians' demand for equal status in Canada and to officially recognise British, French, and other ethnic groups in Canada (Esses & Gardner, 1996). …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,823
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0020,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,004

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,083
Tête enseignante GPT0,346
Écart entre enseignants0,263 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations22
Publié2011
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienneMême sujetCareer Development and DiversityTravaux en français237 207