MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2058508732 · doi:10.1037/a0025549

Canadian counselling psychologists' contributions to applied psychology.

2011· article· en· W2058508732 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ada L. Sinacore, William A. Borgen, Judith C. Daniluk, Anusha Kassan, Bonita C. Long, Jennifer J. Nicol

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCareer Development and Diversity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyApplied psychologySchool psychologyPsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The goal of this paper is to draw attention to the contributions of Canadian counselling psychologists in three key areas central to the discipline: (a) multiculturalism, social justice, and advocacy; (b) health, wellness, and prevention, and (c) career psychology. Accordingly, we have situated our discussion within a historical framework of the discipline followed by a discussion of the Canadian context, definitions, and specific contributions. Finally, we offer a summary of the strengths and current challenges faced by Canadian counselling psychologists. Keywords: counselling psychology, multiculturalism, health, career In this article we highlight the unique contributions of Canadian counselling psychology to the broader field of applied psychology. To accomplish this, we focus primarily on works authored by Canadian counselling psychologists. In particular, we begin by providing a brief overview of multiculturalism, social justice, and advocacy, wherein we discuss the unique Canadian context within which the discipline of counselling psychology resides. As well, we review the literature on three populations that Canadian counselling psychologists have studied, namely aboriginal peoples, immigrants, and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and trans (LGBT) people. We follow this review with a discussion of the multicultural competency literature and the emerging social justice paradigm in the discipline. In keeping with the multicultural framework presented in the first section, we provide a discussion of the vast health-related research conducted by Canadian counsellors and counselling psychologists, and identify their unique contributions. In particular, we categorise these works under the headings of health, wellness, and prevention. To ensure clarity, we offer our current definitions of these three headings. This section is followed by a discussion of the occupation, vocation, and career development literature, wherein we reflect upon the evolution of these areas within the context of career and counselling psychology in Canada. Specifically, we offer current definitions for widely used terms in this domain of the field. In addition, we offer our conceptualisation of career development as psychological transition. Next, to conclude, we briefly discuss the methodological frameworks used in all of these areas of research. Finally, we offer our summary of the strengths and current challenges faced by Canadian counselling psychologists doing all of this important work. Multiculturalism, Social Justice, and Advocacy We begin our overview in the areas of multiculturalism, social justice, and advocacy in Canadian counselling psychology noting that, historically, the discipline of counselling psychology, and the multicultural movement therein, was founded in the United States (Young & Nicol, 2007). As a result, Canadian counselling psychologists have largely relied on the United States' infrastructure, including, but not limited to, American publication outlets (e.g., Journal of Counseling Psychology). Thus, to highlight Canadian counselling psychology research, we will both refer to the foundational American work from which this research emanated as well as the body of scholarship Canadian authors have published both in Canada and the United States. Nevertheless, Canadian counselling psychology has an approach to diversity and multiculturalism that is distinct from that of its American counterparts (Lalande, 2004). In fact, Canada is historically and increasingly a culturally diverse nation with a longstanding policy of multiculturalism, which encourages individuals to maintain their cultural backgrounds while sharing in the common Canadian experience (Berry, 1984). In fact, Canada's first official policy pertaining to multiculturalism dates back to the early 1970s. The Official Languages Act and, later, the Multiculturalism Within a Bilingual Framework were initiated in response both to French Canadians' demand for equal status in Canada and to officially recognise British, French, and other ethnic groups in Canada (Esses & Gardner, 1996). …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.026
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.883
Threshold uncertainty score0.850

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.026
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.007
Science and technology studies0.0230.011
Scholarly communication0.0080.002
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienneSame topicCareer Development and DiversityFrench-language works237,207