Predictors of delayed treatment of Kawasaki disease in community and tertiary care hospitals
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
From 1995 to 2006, all hospitals and pediatric cardiologists in Ontario were contacted to identify all children diagnosed with KD. The following data were retrieved: demographics, day of week admitted, symptoms, clinical features, and treatment. Hospital KD caseload was defined as low (<20 cases/year) or high (≥20 cases/year). The only institution with a KD program was the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto. The primary outcome was the number of days of fever prior to treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg). Secondary outcome was the number of days between admission and treatment with IVIg. Data analysis was performed using multivariable linear and logistic regression models. The estimate* (est) reflects the change in the outcome (days) associated with a 1 unit increment (if continuous) or the presence (if binary) of the variable. The analysis was carried with and without data from the tertiary care centre. 2378 patients were included, 1472 (62%) of which were male. Median age was 3.2 years (range 0.05-22.0), and 73% were ≤4 years. Thirty percent of patients had <4 clinical features of KD. The median number of days of fever at diagnosis was 6 (range 0-30). Eight percent of patients had >10 days of fever at admission, and 13% were treated with IVIg at >10 days of fever. Patients seen at lower KD caseload hospitals had fewer days of fever at admission (est 0.0031; p =0.005), but hospital volume did not impact number of days of fever at IVIg treatment ( p =NS). Lower hospital volume was associated with a greater delay between admission and IVIg treatment (est 0.002; p =0.01). Thus, although patients presented to lower caseload hospitals earlier in their illness, treatment with IVIg did not occur until later. The most significant factor associated with delay in treatment was day of presentation. Children admitted on Sunday (est 0.80; p =0.04) or Monday (est 0.69; p =0.06) had more days of fever at time of treatment with IVIg, pointing to a parent/family/work-related factor. Exclusion of the hospital with a KD program gave even more significant results (Sun: est 1.21; p =0.004 and Mon: est 0.78; p =0.05). Admission on Sunday was also associated with greater delay between admission and treatment (est 0.30 p =0.04; excluding tertiary care centre: est 0.54; p=0.001), pointing to a potential health care provider-related factor. Non-patient related risk factors associated with delayed diagnosis and treatment of KD include admission to low-caseload hospitals and admission on Sunday. This emphasizes the need for interventions to target both parents and health care professionals, especially those in locations with low KD case volume and where resources may be limited on weekends.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».