MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059422337 · doi:10.1186/1546-0096-10-s1-a89

Predictors of delayed treatment of Kawasaki disease in community and tertiary care hospitals

2012· article· en· W2059422337 on OpenAlexaffabout
Nadia Luca, Joyce C.Y. Ching, Cedric Manlhiot, Brian W. McCrindle, Rae S. M. Yeung

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Rheumatology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicKawasaki Disease and Coronary Complications
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLogistic regressionPediatricsDemographicsKawasaki diseaseTertiary careRheumatologyEmergency medicineInternal medicineDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

From 1995 to 2006, all hospitals and pediatric cardiologists in Ontario were contacted to identify all children diagnosed with KD. The following data were retrieved: demographics, day of week admitted, symptoms, clinical features, and treatment. Hospital KD caseload was defined as low (<20 cases/year) or high (≥20 cases/year). The only institution with a KD program was the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto. The primary outcome was the number of days of fever prior to treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg). Secondary outcome was the number of days between admission and treatment with IVIg. Data analysis was performed using multivariable linear and logistic regression models. The estimate* (est) reflects the change in the outcome (days) associated with a 1 unit increment (if continuous) or the presence (if binary) of the variable. The analysis was carried with and without data from the tertiary care centre. 2378 patients were included, 1472 (62%) of which were male. Median age was 3.2 years (range 0.05-22.0), and 73% were ≤4 years. Thirty percent of patients had <4 clinical features of KD. The median number of days of fever at diagnosis was 6 (range 0-30). Eight percent of patients had >10 days of fever at admission, and 13% were treated with IVIg at >10 days of fever. Patients seen at lower KD caseload hospitals had fewer days of fever at admission (est 0.0031; p =0.005), but hospital volume did not impact number of days of fever at IVIg treatment ( p =NS). Lower hospital volume was associated with a greater delay between admission and IVIg treatment (est 0.002; p =0.01). Thus, although patients presented to lower caseload hospitals earlier in their illness, treatment with IVIg did not occur until later. The most significant factor associated with delay in treatment was day of presentation. Children admitted on Sunday (est 0.80; p =0.04) or Monday (est 0.69; p =0.06) had more days of fever at time of treatment with IVIg, pointing to a parent/family/work-related factor. Exclusion of the hospital with a KD program gave even more significant results (Sun: est 1.21; p =0.004 and Mon: est 0.78; p =0.05). Admission on Sunday was also associated with greater delay between admission and treatment (est 0.30 p =0.04; excluding tertiary care centre: est 0.54; p=0.001), pointing to a potential health care provider-related factor. Non-patient related risk factors associated with delayed diagnosis and treatment of KD include admission to low-caseload hospitals and admission on Sunday. This emphasizes the need for interventions to target both parents and health care professionals, especially those in locations with low KD case volume and where resources may be limited on weekends.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.417

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric RheumatologySame topicKawasaki Disease and Coronary ComplicationsFrench-language works237,207