MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2059690185 · doi:10.1353/esc.0.0141

Expect Delays: Procrastination and the Graduate Student

2008· article· en· W2059690185 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Theo Finigan

Notice bibliographique

RevueEnglish studies in Canada · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiquePsychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIdeologyProcrastinationSociologyPerspective (graphical)PsychologyAestheticsLawMedia studiesSocial psychologyPoliticsPolitical scienceVisual artsPhilosophyArt

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Expect Delays: Procrastination and the Graduate Student Theo Finigan (bio) My experience of graduate school began, in a sense, with an act of procrastination. Back when I was an undergraduate, I simultaneously moonlighted as a professional dishwasher, and, as I attempted to juggle this (what seemed to me) hard labour with my first year of study and its attendant classes, assignments, and social obligations, I began to form an image of university life as delightfully Utopian—an image that seemed particularly resonant on those nights when I had to wallow elbow deep in dirty suds for twelve hours at a time. I remember quite vividly one particularly rough night at work, harried by demanding waiters and buried beneath piles of dirty dishes, someone asking me “What I wanted to do with my life.” My answer came as if premeditated, even though I can’t recall ever having formulated it before: I wanted to get a phd in English and become a professor. Simply put, I think, I desperately wanted to delay, for as long as humanly possible, the necessity of working a job I didn’t like. Of course, from the ostensibly more “enlightened” vantage point afforded by a rudimentary education in critical theory, I now recognize this perspective as a rather naïve valorization of the “life of the mind,” an idealist view premised on a misrecognition of the complex material and ideological entanglement of intellectual and bodily forms of labour in [End Page 4] a late capitalist economy. At the same time, though, I would argue that graduate work nonetheless maintains a close (if vexed) connection with the originary procrastinatory urge I detect in this late-teenaged romanticization of academe. As philosopher Mark Kingwell has astutely noted, “[G]raduate school in the humanities is an especially acute site of procrastination,” fertile—or perhaps toxic—ground for the latter’s “intricate mixture of self-justification and self-loathing,” its “self-defeating spirals of defensible deferral” (364). The prime mover in this anxious universe is, as Kingwell observes, the doctoral dissertation: a large and difficult project “with an unspecific deadline, which is to say no deadline at all,” and which, as a result, “feels at once pressing and pointless” (368). On the one hand, “there is too much to do, the important task ... too big to tackle” (Kingwell 365): the dissertation—particularly in the halting middle stages in which I currently find myself—simply seems too Sisyphean a task to complete. There is no way for you to sit down and, as in the famous advertising slogan, “Just do it,” and the intermittent realization of this apparent fact tends to make any work seem rather pointless or futile, thus heightening the attraction of other more pleasant or practicable diversions. On the other hand, and somewhat paradoxically, the relatively elastic time frame in which the project is to be completed—say two to four years for the dissertation itself—means that for a large part of the process nothing necessarily feels all that pressing, and thus everything becomes relatively easy to put off for one more day. Graduate school—and, more particularly, the dissertation-writing process—thus might be said to consist in a continual oscillation between a nearly existential despair (I’ll never finish anyway, so what’s the use) and a flippant nonchalance (It’ll get done; may as well go have a beer), a kind of procrastinatory dialectic whose synthesis is, all too often, “stasis” (Kingwell 365). Complicating matters is the fact that successful graduate work is to a large extent reliant on self-motivation and self-surveillance, meaning that there are few “external constraints” (Kingwell 369) in place to keep the errant procrastinator on the straight and narrow, except, perhaps, in the form of various “secondary” tasks endemic to graduate school, whose “primary” goal is ostensibly the completion of a thesis. These tasks—I’m thinking of, say, teaching or “ta-ing,” committee work, attending conferences, and polishing work for possible publication—tend at once to appear more pressing (since they involve the expectations of others) and slightly more straightforward to accomplish, thus encouraging the “deferral of action” that Richard Beardsworth locates at the etymological root of...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,328
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,605

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,119
Tête enseignante GPT0,356
Écart entre enseignants0,237 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2008
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEnglish studies in CanadaMême sujetPsychoanalysis, Philosophy, and PoliticsTravaux en français237 207