MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059690185 · doi:10.1353/esc.0.0141

Expect Delays: Procrastination and the Graduate Student

2008· article· en· W2059690185 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Theo Finigan

Bibliographic record

VenueEnglish studies in Canada · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdeologyProcrastinationSociologyPerspective (graphical)PsychologyAestheticsLawMedia studiesSocial psychologyPoliticsPolitical scienceVisual artsPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Expect Delays: Procrastination and the Graduate Student Theo Finigan (bio) My experience of graduate school began, in a sense, with an act of procrastination. Back when I was an undergraduate, I simultaneously moonlighted as a professional dishwasher, and, as I attempted to juggle this (what seemed to me) hard labour with my first year of study and its attendant classes, assignments, and social obligations, I began to form an image of university life as delightfully Utopian—an image that seemed particularly resonant on those nights when I had to wallow elbow deep in dirty suds for twelve hours at a time. I remember quite vividly one particularly rough night at work, harried by demanding waiters and buried beneath piles of dirty dishes, someone asking me “What I wanted to do with my life.” My answer came as if premeditated, even though I can’t recall ever having formulated it before: I wanted to get a phd in English and become a professor. Simply put, I think, I desperately wanted to delay, for as long as humanly possible, the necessity of working a job I didn’t like. Of course, from the ostensibly more “enlightened” vantage point afforded by a rudimentary education in critical theory, I now recognize this perspective as a rather naïve valorization of the “life of the mind,” an idealist view premised on a misrecognition of the complex material and ideological entanglement of intellectual and bodily forms of labour in [End Page 4] a late capitalist economy. At the same time, though, I would argue that graduate work nonetheless maintains a close (if vexed) connection with the originary procrastinatory urge I detect in this late-teenaged romanticization of academe. As philosopher Mark Kingwell has astutely noted, “[G]raduate school in the humanities is an especially acute site of procrastination,” fertile—or perhaps toxic—ground for the latter’s “intricate mixture of self-justification and self-loathing,” its “self-defeating spirals of defensible deferral” (364). The prime mover in this anxious universe is, as Kingwell observes, the doctoral dissertation: a large and difficult project “with an unspecific deadline, which is to say no deadline at all,” and which, as a result, “feels at once pressing and pointless” (368). On the one hand, “there is too much to do, the important task ... too big to tackle” (Kingwell 365): the dissertation—particularly in the halting middle stages in which I currently find myself—simply seems too Sisyphean a task to complete. There is no way for you to sit down and, as in the famous advertising slogan, “Just do it,” and the intermittent realization of this apparent fact tends to make any work seem rather pointless or futile, thus heightening the attraction of other more pleasant or practicable diversions. On the other hand, and somewhat paradoxically, the relatively elastic time frame in which the project is to be completed—say two to four years for the dissertation itself—means that for a large part of the process nothing necessarily feels all that pressing, and thus everything becomes relatively easy to put off for one more day. Graduate school—and, more particularly, the dissertation-writing process—thus might be said to consist in a continual oscillation between a nearly existential despair (I’ll never finish anyway, so what’s the use) and a flippant nonchalance (It’ll get done; may as well go have a beer), a kind of procrastinatory dialectic whose synthesis is, all too often, “stasis” (Kingwell 365). Complicating matters is the fact that successful graduate work is to a large extent reliant on self-motivation and self-surveillance, meaning that there are few “external constraints” (Kingwell 369) in place to keep the errant procrastinator on the straight and narrow, except, perhaps, in the form of various “secondary” tasks endemic to graduate school, whose “primary” goal is ostensibly the completion of a thesis. These tasks—I’m thinking of, say, teaching or “ta-ing,” committee work, attending conferences, and polishing work for possible publication—tend at once to appear more pressing (since they involve the expectations of others) and slightly more straightforward to accomplish, thus encouraging the “deferral of action” that Richard Beardsworth locates at the etymological root of...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.328
Threshold uncertainty score0.605

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.119
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnglish studies in CanadaSame topicPsychoanalysis, Philosophy, and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207