Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Welcome to 2008 and what will be a very exciting year in the world of wound care. In early June, the 3rd Congress of the World Union of Wound Healing Societies (WUWHS) takes place in Toronto, Canada. This congress aims to be the biggest and the best, with around 5000 delegates, 200 exhibitors, 250 faculty, over 800 posters and a truly international perspective. The congress has the support of many worldwide associations, industry and publishers. It is truly a collaborative effort to ensure the best possible congress for all participants At the time of publication of this edition of the IWJ, the abstract deadline will have passed – so hopefully you did not miss out. Registrations are increasing fast, and because the venue space limits the attendance at approximately 5000, the event could sell out – a first in the field of wounds. This year will also see the fifth anniversary of the International Wound Journal (IWJ). To help celebrate our fifth year and also the 3rd Congress of the WUWHS, both organisations will collaborate on a number of exciting events. The IWJ will host a symposium targeted at those wishing to be able to communicate their clinical and research findings in a more effective way. Look out for a special IWJ supplement that will be distributed at this satellite conference bringing you the top ten accessed articles online through Blackwell Synergy, which we have published since our launch. We will also work with the World Union and its partner organisations to have a commemorative edition of the IWJ specifically focused on the subject matter of the congress. This will be a listed edition of the Journal, with all articles having gone through the peer-review process. The edition will be published in May just prior to the congress. The commemorative edition will be exciting and different, with many interesting articles, which will provide background information for many of the sessions at the congress. The excitement, activity and stress, for those of us on the organising committee, are building and I am sure that you have seen the dermatologist with a red hat (Dr Gary Sibbald – Conference Chair) on numerous occasions and in many countries. If you are unaware of this congress, then we have failed to do our job as an organising committee. The philosophy of our congress is all inclusive and international. If the abstract submissions are an indication of the likely delegate profile, then we will achieve our objective as we are on target to receive over 1000 submissions. The Toronto Congress Committee has not achieved this in isolation. We have had significant help from our partnering organisations and also from others, although they have their own congresses in North America during 2008. North America has embraced the challenge of holding an International Congress on its home soil, benefiting the world of wound care on an international basis. A model has been established to help other countries, societies and individuals to bid to host the 4th Congress of the WUWHS in 2012. Indeed, if you are considering applying, then visit their website for the application process (www.worldunion2012.com). The IWJ is proud to be a publishing partner of the WUWHS, and we look forward to an exciting, invigorating, interesting Congress 2008.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».