Notice bibliographique
Résumé
John D. Wirth, Gildred Professor of Latin American Studies at Stanford University, died of a heart aneurysm on June 20, 2002. Wirth was a member of the generation of Latin Americanists who entered the field in the wake of the Cuban Revolution, and was a pioneer in the little-studied area of Brazilian history, about which he would publish two major monographs. He later moved on to study the environmental history of the U.S.-Mexican border. For his Politics of Brazilian Development, 1930-1954 (1970), he won the Bolton Prize of the Conference of Latin American History, and won an honorable mention for a Bolton with Minas Gerais in the Brazilian Federation, 1889-1937 (1977). His Smelter Smoke in North America: The Politics of Transborder Pollution, appeared in 2000. In addition, he edited or co-edited four books and contributed dozens of articles to journals and collections. At his death, he was beginning a book on the history of Brazilian environmental problems, and thus returning to the country of his initial interest. But John Wirth was not only a distinguished scholar; as a teacher he directed numerous Ph.D. dissertations, and made his mark as an institution-builder as well. At Stanford, where he remained from graduate school to retirement in 2002, Wirth headed Stanford's Center for Latin American Studies for eight years, consolidating Stanford's eminence in the training of Latin Americanists. In addition, at various times he chaired the Spanish Department and the Stanford University Press board, playing a major role in helping the Press become a leader in the publication of monographs on Latin America. Later, Wirth put his administrative skills at the service of the University at large, as Vice Provost for Academic Planning. Beyond the Stanford campus, Wirth was a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, the nation's most prestigious private foreign policy body. By presidential appointment, he also served on an advisory board on the environment for the North American Free Trade Association (NAFTA). Yet in the policy area I believe he took the greatest pride in co-founding the North American Institute, a public affairs forum concerned with the environmental issues common to the United States, Mexico, and Canada. He was president of the Santa Fe-based NAMI from 1991 until his death. Such diverse activities show that Wirth's impact on Latin American studies and policy extended well beyond his teaching and scholarly writings. Born in Dawson, New Mexico, in 1936, John Wirth was educated at Putney School, Harvard, and Stanford, and held scholarships or fellowships at all three. [End Page vii] He received his Ph.D. from Stanford in 1967, shortly after becoming an instructor there. I met John five years earlier, and got to know him well in 1963-64, when we were both studying Brazilian history with Stanley Stein at Columbia University. Also enrolled in the course was Robert Levine, Stein's student at Princeton. Later in 1964 the three of us went to Brazil for dissertation research. Seeing each other frequently in Brazil led to intensive scholarly collaboration four years later, when we three began a project on regionalism in Brazilian politics, society, and economy. The enterprise lasted twelve years, with many face-to-face meetings in the United States and Brazil, where we all spent a calendar year in 1969-70, and returned together later. The three state-based volumes that eventually appeared on Brazilian federalism were explicitly designed as comparative studies. In fact we believed this to be the largest collaborative project ever mounted among U. S. historians of Latin America. Although I had just completed a dissertation on Rio Grande do Sul as a regional power in Brazilian politics, the initial inspiration for the multi-book project was Wirth's. The three studies asked the same questions, relating state to nation; they used the same definitions and same types of data; and they had the same chapter format. They addressed the issues of economic structures and dynamics, regional society and culture, state and national politics, center-periphery...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,269 | 0,190 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».