MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060728467 · doi:10.1353/tam.2003.0075

John D. Wirth.

2003· article· en· W2060728467 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Joseph L. Love

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Americas A Quarterly Review of Latin American History · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Relations in Latin America
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLatin AmericansPoliticsHistoryEconomic historyLatin American studiesWorld War IIPolitical scienceClassicsLawArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

John D. Wirth, Gildred Professor of Latin American Studies at Stanford University, died of a heart aneurysm on June 20, 2002. Wirth was a member of the generation of Latin Americanists who entered the field in the wake of the Cuban Revolution, and was a pioneer in the little-studied area of Brazilian history, about which he would publish two major monographs. He later moved on to study the environmental history of the U.S.-Mexican border. For his Politics of Brazilian Development, 1930-1954 (1970), he won the Bolton Prize of the Conference of Latin American History, and won an honorable mention for a Bolton with Minas Gerais in the Brazilian Federation, 1889-1937 (1977). His Smelter Smoke in North America: The Politics of Transborder Pollution, appeared in 2000. In addition, he edited or co-edited four books and contributed dozens of articles to journals and collections. At his death, he was beginning a book on the history of Brazilian environmental problems, and thus returning to the country of his initial interest. But John Wirth was not only a distinguished scholar; as a teacher he directed numerous Ph.D. dissertations, and made his mark as an institution-builder as well. At Stanford, where he remained from graduate school to retirement in 2002, Wirth headed Stanford's Center for Latin American Studies for eight years, consolidating Stanford's eminence in the training of Latin Americanists. In addition, at various times he chaired the Spanish Department and the Stanford University Press board, playing a major role in helping the Press become a leader in the publication of monographs on Latin America. Later, Wirth put his administrative skills at the service of the University at large, as Vice Provost for Academic Planning. Beyond the Stanford campus, Wirth was a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, the nation's most prestigious private foreign policy body. By presidential appointment, he also served on an advisory board on the environment for the North American Free Trade Association (NAFTA). Yet in the policy area I believe he took the greatest pride in co-founding the North American Institute, a public affairs forum concerned with the environmental issues common to the United States, Mexico, and Canada. He was president of the Santa Fe-based NAMI from 1991 until his death. Such diverse activities show that Wirth's impact on Latin American studies and policy extended well beyond his teaching and scholarly writings. Born in Dawson, New Mexico, in 1936, John Wirth was educated at Putney School, Harvard, and Stanford, and held scholarships or fellowships at all three. [End Page vii] He received his Ph.D. from Stanford in 1967, shortly after becoming an instructor there. I met John five years earlier, and got to know him well in 1963-64, when we were both studying Brazilian history with Stanley Stein at Columbia University. Also enrolled in the course was Robert Levine, Stein's student at Princeton. Later in 1964 the three of us went to Brazil for dissertation research. Seeing each other frequently in Brazil led to intensive scholarly collaboration four years later, when we three began a project on regionalism in Brazilian politics, society, and economy. The enterprise lasted twelve years, with many face-to-face meetings in the United States and Brazil, where we all spent a calendar year in 1969-70, and returned together later. The three state-based volumes that eventually appeared on Brazilian federalism were explicitly designed as comparative studies. In fact we believed this to be the largest collaborative project ever mounted among U. S. historians of Latin America. Although I had just completed a dissertation on Rio Grande do Sul as a regional power in Brazilian politics, the initial inspiration for the multi-book project was Wirth's. The three studies asked the same questions, relating state to nation; they used the same definitions and same types of data; and they had the same chapter format. They addressed the issues of economic structures and dynamics, regional society and culture, state and national politics, center-periphery...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.269
Threshold uncertainty score0.899

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2690.190

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Americas A Quarterly Review of Latin American HistorySame topicInternational Relations in Latin AmericaFrench-language works237,207