Wideband Reflectance Norms for Caucasian and Chinese Young Adults
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In Brief Objective: This study examined differences between the middle ears of two ethnic groups, Caucasian and Chinese young adults with normal hearing, using a new middle-ear measurement technique, wideband energy reflectance. The goal of this study was to determine whether the Chinese group had different middle-ear transmission properties than the Caucasian group. Design: There were 126 subjects (237 ears) between the ages of 18 and 32 yr, with 62 subjects in the Caucasian group and 64 subjects in the Chinese group. Wideband energy reflectance data were gathered using Mimosa Acoustics (RMS system version 4.0.4.4) wideband reflectance (WBR) equipment. Results: The Chinese group had significantly lower wideband energy reflectance than their Caucasian counterparts at higher frequencies; however, the Caucasian group had significantly lower energy reflectance at lower frequencies than the Chinese group. The Chinese group also had significantly lower admittance magnitude than the Caucasian group at lower frequencies. Because body size indices are more comparable between Caucasian females and Chinese males, the effect of body size could be potentially adjusted for by comparing the Caucasian female subjects with the Chinese male subjects. The differences observed between the Caucasian and the Chinese groups were no longer significant when the Caucasian female subjects were compared with the Chinese male subjects. Applying the Caucasian norms to four Caucasian adults with surgically confirmed otosclerosis resulted in an improved hit rate compared with the combined Caucasian and Chinese norms and the Chinese-only norms. Conclusion: Body size may play a role in the observed differences between the Caucasian and Chinese groups. The findings of this study suggest that further research is needed to investigate the effects of body size on wideband energy reflectance. It should be noted that factors other than body size may contribute to the observed differences. Chinese individuals may simply have different middle-ear characteristics than Caucasian individuals, which could affect WBR. In the meantime, overall test performance may be improved by using a more homogeneous norm when evaluating the middle ear of Caucasian or Chinese individuals with WBR. The purpose of this study was to examine whether middle-ear transmission properties differ among Caucasian and Chinese males and females, when measured with commercially available wideband reflectance (WBR) equipment. This is an important issue to investigate as overall test performance could potentially be improved using a more homogeneous norm when evaluating the middle-ear of Caucasian or Chinese individuals with WBR. 126 subjects (62 Caucasian and 64 Chinese) were tested using Mimosa Acoustics WBR equipment. It was found that the Chinese group had significantly lower WBR than their Caucasian counterparts at higher frequencies; however, the Caucasian group had significantly lower energy reflectance at lower frequencies than the Chinese group. It seems that body size may play a role in the observed differences between the Caucasian group and Chinese groups. It should be noted that factors other than body size may contribute to the observed differences. Chinese individuals may simply have different middle-ear characteristics than Caucasian individuals that could affect WBR.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».