Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: DanceHall: From Slaveship to Ghetto Katherine Miranda Sonjah Stanley Niaah. 2010. DanceHall: From Slaveship to Ghetto. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press. 238 pp. ISBN: 0776630415. An examination of “reggae’s progeny,” Sonjah Stanley Niaah’s interdisciplinary study addresses dancehall as a musical genre, performance space, aesthetic style and philosophical ethos, examining the phenomenon through its myriad socio-cultural implications. Stanley Niaah delves into dancehall’s contemporary performance practices in Kingston and across the globe, conceptualizing its inception in the physical spaces of Jamaica’s dance halls during the latter half of the twentieth century when recorded music played on sound systems began to dominate formal and informal social events. Unlike recent cultural studies scholarship that examines the ways elements of popular music may reflect, challenge, contest and/or otherwise interact with socio-cultural and national categories (see Rivera, Marshall, and Pacini Hernández 2009), Dancehall’s theoretical framework does quite the opposite. Rather than interpreting aspects of Jamaican culture or identity through dancehall, Stanley Niaah reads dancehall as contemporary Jamaican culture and identity. Through her theoretical “performance geography” framework, the author maps dancehall’s complex systems of practice and spaces of production and consumption to emphasize its everyday place in the lives of inner-city Kingston youth and the ways it reflects contemporary Jamaican social reality. The study underscores how localized dancehall practices and experiences also reflect the continued impoverishment and marginalization of Afro-Caribbean communities across the region, the centrality of resistance in Black Atlantic cultural expressions and the global impact of Jamaican culture, and complicates research focused solely on musical elements or critiques of dancehall’s “slackness.” Each chapter examines an aspect of dancehall performance, material and spatial conditions and social practices. “Performing Geography in Kingston’s Dancehall Spaces” maps and classifies the locations and uses of dancehall venues to historicize their contemporary use within a tradition of working-class appropriation of public space for celebration and discusses the state policing of commercialized, official and unofficial dancehall events. In “Ritual Space, Celebratory Space,” Stanley [End Page 276] Niaah uses a broad theoretical interpretation of ritual that touches on Victor Turner’s communitas to argue that dancehall practices bridge the popular, performative and celebratory in what the author terms “sacred geographies.” Outlining the names, times, themes, types and purposes of one-time and recurring dancehall events such as Passa Passa, Bembe Thursdays and British link-ups, this chapter intimates a complex matrix of rules and codes where the sacred and secular coalesce through “transcendence of social structure that brings the participant under the authority of the community” (p. 90). “Geographies of Embodiment – Dance, Status, Style” examines the role of the dancer (including interviews with Gerald “Bogle” Levy and Stacey, Dancehall Queen 1999), the economic and social rewards of dancing, the popularization and chronology of specific dance moves and the role of gender and women in the dancehall space and defines dance as a “sixth sense” of embodied elocution. The chapter “Performing Boundarylessness” argues that dancehall practices transcend class, temporal and spatial boundaries both within and outside of Jamaica. It explores Buju Banton’s international tours, the sound system Stone Love and selector Tony Matterhorn, international appearances of dancehall queens, the popularity of dancehall in Japan and the video recording of dancehall events. The final chapter, “A Common Transnational Space,” examines the common geneaologies of Jamaican dancehall, South African kwaito and Puerto Rican reggaetón as black performance genres that are largely “shaped in the margins” (p. 188) of the ghetto, criticized for vulgarity, use informal and/or public spaces to perform, rely on dance and movement for popularity, and are produced in small recording studios. Stanley Niaah insists on the common liminality or “in-between” spaces of these phenomena—created in the margins but mainstreamed, popularly supported but rigorously policed by state authorities. DanceHall is thus a detailed survey of contemporary dancehall practices. What the book’s title proposes is ironically what the work does not do, however, and Stanley Niaah’s tracing of continuities from “slave ship” to “ghetto” are largely unsubstantiated. For example, Stanley Niaah claims current Kingston dancehall events that warm up between 1:00 and 5:00 am are “reminiscent of secret slave...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».