Supporting Siblings Through the Pediatric Bone Marrow Transplant Trajectory
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In Brief When a child undergoes bone marrow transplant (BMT), the entire family is affected by the demands of the transitions encountered throughout the BMT experience. Although there is a growing body of knowledge on how healthy siblings adjust to the BMT experience, there is still much to be learned. Part of a larger study aimed at detailing healthy siblings' lived experiences of BMT, this article presents findings specific to one of the study's objectives that focused on understanding siblings' perspectives of how nurses and other health professionals can best support siblings throughout the BMT trajectory. A qualitative research study guided by the philosophy of hermeneutic phenomenology was conducted. Eight siblings of pediatric BMT recipients were recruited. Semistructured, open-ended interviews, demographic data, and field notes were the primary sources of data. Interview transcripts were analyzed and interpreted using van Manen's approach. Seven themes emerged: (1) include me in the definition of "family," (2) be caring, (3) share information with me, (4) give me choices, (5) help me share my feelings, (6) provide opportunities for me to meet my peers, and (7) create a healthy hospital environment. Findings showed that siblings have definite thoughts about how nurses and other health professionals should support them, but their support needs are not being met. When a child undergoes bone marrow transplant (BMT), the entire family is affected by the demands of the transitions encountered throughout the BMT experience. Although there is a growing body of knowledge on how healthy siblings adjust to the BMT experience, there is still much to be learned. Part of a larger study aimed at detailing healthy siblings' lived experiences of BMT, this article presents findings specific to one of the study's objectives that focused on understanding siblings' perspectives of how nurses and other health professionals can best support siblings throughout the BMT trajectory. A qualitative research study guided by the philosophy of hermeneutic phenomenology was conducted. Eight siblings of pediatric BMT recipients were recruited. Semistructured, open-ended interviews, demographic data, and field notes were the primary sources of data. Interview transcripts were analyzed and interpreted using van Manen's approach. Seven themes emerged: (1) include me in the definition of "family," (2) be caring, (3) share information with me, (4) give me choices, (5) help me share my feelings, (6) provide opportunities for me to meet my peers, and (7) create a healthy hospital environment. Findings showed that siblings have definite thoughts about how nurses and other health professionals should support them, but their support needs are not being met.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».