Supporting Siblings Through the Pediatric Bone Marrow Transplant Trajectory
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Brief When a child undergoes bone marrow transplant (BMT), the entire family is affected by the demands of the transitions encountered throughout the BMT experience. Although there is a growing body of knowledge on how healthy siblings adjust to the BMT experience, there is still much to be learned. Part of a larger study aimed at detailing healthy siblings' lived experiences of BMT, this article presents findings specific to one of the study's objectives that focused on understanding siblings' perspectives of how nurses and other health professionals can best support siblings throughout the BMT trajectory. A qualitative research study guided by the philosophy of hermeneutic phenomenology was conducted. Eight siblings of pediatric BMT recipients were recruited. Semistructured, open-ended interviews, demographic data, and field notes were the primary sources of data. Interview transcripts were analyzed and interpreted using van Manen's approach. Seven themes emerged: (1) include me in the definition of "family," (2) be caring, (3) share information with me, (4) give me choices, (5) help me share my feelings, (6) provide opportunities for me to meet my peers, and (7) create a healthy hospital environment. Findings showed that siblings have definite thoughts about how nurses and other health professionals should support them, but their support needs are not being met. When a child undergoes bone marrow transplant (BMT), the entire family is affected by the demands of the transitions encountered throughout the BMT experience. Although there is a growing body of knowledge on how healthy siblings adjust to the BMT experience, there is still much to be learned. Part of a larger study aimed at detailing healthy siblings' lived experiences of BMT, this article presents findings specific to one of the study's objectives that focused on understanding siblings' perspectives of how nurses and other health professionals can best support siblings throughout the BMT trajectory. A qualitative research study guided by the philosophy of hermeneutic phenomenology was conducted. Eight siblings of pediatric BMT recipients were recruited. Semistructured, open-ended interviews, demographic data, and field notes were the primary sources of data. Interview transcripts were analyzed and interpreted using van Manen's approach. Seven themes emerged: (1) include me in the definition of "family," (2) be caring, (3) share information with me, (4) give me choices, (5) help me share my feelings, (6) provide opportunities for me to meet my peers, and (7) create a healthy hospital environment. Findings showed that siblings have definite thoughts about how nurses and other health professionals should support them, but their support needs are not being met.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".