MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2065422469 · doi:10.1094/pdis.2000.84.6.705b

First Report of Blight of Field Peppers Caused by <i>Phytophthora capsici</i> in Ontario

2000· article· en· W2065422469 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Terry Anderson, R.W. Garton

Notice bibliographique

RevuePlant Disease · 2000
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiquePlant Pathogens and Resistance
Établissements canadiensBrock UniversityAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPhytophthora capsiciBiologySporangiumSquashPepperBlightHorticultureCucurbita pepoPhytophthoraChlamydosporeBotanySporeMycelium

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In August 1994, a disease of sweet peppers (Capsicum annuum L.) and butternut squash (Cucurbita pepo L.) was observed in a 2-ha field near Harrow, Essex County, ON, Canada. In 1995, a similar disease was noted on peppers at two locations 30 km apart in Essex County. In 1997, the disease occurred on peppers in a 20-ha field in the vicinity of the 1994 outbreak. Yield loss was estimated at 40 to 60% in pepper fields and 20% in the affected squash field. Brown, necrotic lesions were more prevalent on pepper fruits and upper stems and lateral branches than basal stems. Affected plants occurred in lower areas of fields that had been flooded by rain or irrigation. Gray, floccose masses of sporangia were evident on fruits and stems under humid conditions and on the internal surfaces of infected fruits. Symptoms were similar to those described for Phytophthora blight of pepper (1). Squash infections occurred where fruits contacted soil. Isolations were made from sections of fruit, stems, and leaves of pepper and squash plants with symptoms of disease on lima beans (Difco Laboratories, Detroit) or 20% V8 agar medium and incubated at 22°C. Phytophthora capsici was readily isolated from all plants with disease symptoms. Observations of colony morphology and growth were made on cultures on 20% V8 agar at 25°C under continuous fluorescent light. Sporangia were papillate and averaged 45 ± 5.9 × 27 ± 3.5 μm in size (range 28 to 58 × 21 × 39 μm). Oospores were spherical and 23 ± 2.9 μm in diameter (range 16 to 28 μm) and, when the external wall was included, were 28 ±2.7 μm in diameter (range 23 to 37 μm). Pedicels varied in length, averaging 63 ± 30.9 μm (range 9 to 129 μm). These observations are similar to those described for P. capsici (2). Mating type was determined by coculture with isolates obtained from A. F. Schmitthenner (OARDC, Wooster, OH) designated A1 and A2. Oospore development was determined after 10 days growth at 25°C on 20% V8 agar. Mating types A1 and A2 occurred among Ontario isolates from pepper and squash. In 1995, 13 of 15 isolates tested were A1, and in 1997, 1 of 5 was A1. Both mating types were found in the same field. Pathogenicity of pepper and squash isolates was tested by inoculating greenhouse-grown pepper cvs. Merlin and North Star at the 5-leaf stage by adding 5 ml of a spore suspension (1,000 sporangia per ml) to the crown and adjacent soil or sprayed on the foliage until run off. Plants were covered in plastic bags for 24 h. Wilting and plant death occurred at 4 and 10 days, respectively, with both cultivars. Crown-inoculated plants wilted prior to development of brown lesions on lower stems at the soil line. Symptoms on foliar-inoculated plants were first observed on young tissue at growing points and stem nodes. P. capsici was reisolated from affected tissue. This is the first report of Phytophthora blight of sweet pepper in Ontario. References: (1) L. H. Leonian. Phytopathology 12:401, 1922. (2) P. H. Tsao and A. Alizadeh. 1988. Proceedings of the 10th International Cocoa Research Conference. Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, pp. 441-445.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,442
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,180
Écart entre enseignants0,170 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations19
Publié2000
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePlant DiseaseMême sujetPlant Pathogens and ResistanceTravaux en français237 207