MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2065422469 · doi:10.1094/pdis.2000.84.6.705b

First Report of Blight of Field Peppers Caused by <i>Phytophthora capsici</i> in Ontario

2000· article· en· W2065422469 on OpenAlexaffabout
Terry Anderson, R.W. Garton

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Disease · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Pathogens and Resistance
Canadian institutionsBrock UniversityAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhytophthora capsiciBiologySporangiumSquashPepperBlightHorticultureCucurbita pepoPhytophthoraChlamydosporeBotanySporeMycelium

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In August 1994, a disease of sweet peppers (Capsicum annuum L.) and butternut squash (Cucurbita pepo L.) was observed in a 2-ha field near Harrow, Essex County, ON, Canada. In 1995, a similar disease was noted on peppers at two locations 30 km apart in Essex County. In 1997, the disease occurred on peppers in a 20-ha field in the vicinity of the 1994 outbreak. Yield loss was estimated at 40 to 60% in pepper fields and 20% in the affected squash field. Brown, necrotic lesions were more prevalent on pepper fruits and upper stems and lateral branches than basal stems. Affected plants occurred in lower areas of fields that had been flooded by rain or irrigation. Gray, floccose masses of sporangia were evident on fruits and stems under humid conditions and on the internal surfaces of infected fruits. Symptoms were similar to those described for Phytophthora blight of pepper (1). Squash infections occurred where fruits contacted soil. Isolations were made from sections of fruit, stems, and leaves of pepper and squash plants with symptoms of disease on lima beans (Difco Laboratories, Detroit) or 20% V8 agar medium and incubated at 22°C. Phytophthora capsici was readily isolated from all plants with disease symptoms. Observations of colony morphology and growth were made on cultures on 20% V8 agar at 25°C under continuous fluorescent light. Sporangia were papillate and averaged 45 ± 5.9 × 27 ± 3.5 μm in size (range 28 to 58 × 21 × 39 μm). Oospores were spherical and 23 ± 2.9 μm in diameter (range 16 to 28 μm) and, when the external wall was included, were 28 ±2.7 μm in diameter (range 23 to 37 μm). Pedicels varied in length, averaging 63 ± 30.9 μm (range 9 to 129 μm). These observations are similar to those described for P. capsici (2). Mating type was determined by coculture with isolates obtained from A. F. Schmitthenner (OARDC, Wooster, OH) designated A1 and A2. Oospore development was determined after 10 days growth at 25°C on 20% V8 agar. Mating types A1 and A2 occurred among Ontario isolates from pepper and squash. In 1995, 13 of 15 isolates tested were A1, and in 1997, 1 of 5 was A1. Both mating types were found in the same field. Pathogenicity of pepper and squash isolates was tested by inoculating greenhouse-grown pepper cvs. Merlin and North Star at the 5-leaf stage by adding 5 ml of a spore suspension (1,000 sporangia per ml) to the crown and adjacent soil or sprayed on the foliage until run off. Plants were covered in plastic bags for 24 h. Wilting and plant death occurred at 4 and 10 days, respectively, with both cultivars. Crown-inoculated plants wilted prior to development of brown lesions on lower stems at the soil line. Symptoms on foliar-inoculated plants were first observed on young tissue at growing points and stem nodes. P. capsici was reisolated from affected tissue. This is the first report of Phytophthora blight of sweet pepper in Ontario. References: (1) L. H. Leonian. Phytopathology 12:401, 1922. (2) P. H. Tsao and A. Alizadeh. 1988. Proceedings of the 10th International Cocoa Research Conference. Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, pp. 441-445.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.442
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant DiseaseSame topicPlant Pathogens and ResistanceFrench-language works237,207