MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2071181418 · doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7458.123

Spiritual needs in health care

2004· editorial· en· W2071181418 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Peter Speck, Irene J Higginson, Julia Addington‐Hall

Notice bibliographique

RevueBMJ · 2004
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSpiritualitySpiritual careExistentialismPsychologyExcellenceCoping (psychology)Health careMeaning (existential)Palliative careMysticismPsychotherapistSocial psychologyMedicineNursingAlternative medicineEpistemologyPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Spiritual needs change with time and circumstances. The National Institute for Clinical Excellence guidance, Supportive and Palliative Care for Adults with Cancer, published in March 2004, acknowledges this and recommends that healthcare teams ensure accurate and timely evaluation of spiritual issues through regular assessment. This reflects the increasing emphasis on spirituality as a factor contributing to wellbeing and coping strategies.1-4 A proliferation of textbooks and book chapters with titles containing the word “spirituality” seek to elucidate what spiritual care is, how it might be assessed, and how needs might be met.5 However, a lack of consensus remains as to what spirituality actually is.6 Some key words occur quite regularly in the various descriptions of spirituality in journals and textbooks (box). In health research we should differentiate between the terms spiritual and religious since, if they are used interchangeably, reports of spirituality may be describing religious practice and affiliation.7,8 These can be interrelated. Spiritual belief may or may not be religious, but most religious people will be spiritual. A non-religious person may still therefore have a deep spirituality and spiritual needs. Spiritual care is not just the facilitation of an appropriate ritual but engaging with an individual's search for existential meaning, as reflected in the existential domain of the McGill quality of life questionnaire.9 Variables such as religious practice often seem easier to measure. Where participants for research have drawn from communities where religious practice is at high levels, these studies have shown that participating actively in the life of the faith community seems to lead to better health profiles. Religion also strengthens people's ability to cope with life threatening disease,3,6,10 and its importance in predicting aspects of psychosocial need in patients with cancer has been reported.1 These studies are examining religious affiliation and behaviour even though some of them talk about spirituality. Recently researchers have begun to look at populations that may not be religious but claim to have a clear spiritual belief. King et al reported that 71% of people who entered their acute hospital study had an important spiritual belief, even though many did not express that in a religious way.8 Other studies confirm this proportion and are beginning to show the importance of spiritual belief in predicting clinical outcome,8 the management of death distress,11 end of life despair,2 and assessing quality of life in oncology patients.9,12 Evidence is growing that spiritual belief and religious practice are important predictive factors for a larger proportion of people entering health care than previously thought. Many may benefit from support for this aspect of their life. A need exists for user friendly and brief measures to assess spiritual need in the absence of religious faith, so that it may be addressed properly rather than as some general panacea which is assumed to be good but is not individually tailored. Only in this way may we “ensure that the spiritual elements of disease are taken into account,” as recommended in the guidance from NICE. Key words and phrases in spirituality literature Meaning—making sense of life situations; deriving purpose from existence Existential—searching for personal meaning within one's life, death, and concerns about freedom and isolation Value—cherished beliefs and standards of, for example, truth, beauty, behaviour, or thoughts Transcendence—appreciation of dimension beyond self; creating ability to rise above “here and now” experience Connecting—relationships and communication with self, others, environment, higher power, the sacred Becoming—links to identity, personal growth, through reflection on life experience Coping—means of using or developing strategies in critical life events; achieving inner peace Spirituality—the search for existential or ultimate meaning within a life experience, such as illness. (This belief usually refers to a power other than the self, which people may or may not describe as God, higher power, or forces within nature, and with which they communicate. The power helps the person to transcend the here and now, re-establish hope and the ability to cope) Religion—is an expression of spiritual belief through a framework of rituals, codes, and practices; the sense of otherness or a power being a deity or supreme being Philosophical—relates to the same searching, but with a rejection of any influential power external to the self

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesIntégrité de la recherche
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,110
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,412
Écart entre enseignants0,382 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations104
Publié2004
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBMJMême sujetReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyTravaux en français237 207