MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071181418 · doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7458.123

Spiritual needs in health care

2004· editorial· en· W2071181418 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Peter Speck, Irene J Higginson, Julia Addington‐Hall

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ · 2004
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpiritualitySpiritual careExistentialismPsychologyExcellenceCoping (psychology)Health careMeaning (existential)Palliative careMysticismPsychotherapistSocial psychologyMedicineNursingAlternative medicineEpistemologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spiritual needs change with time and circumstances. The National Institute for Clinical Excellence guidance, Supportive and Palliative Care for Adults with Cancer, published in March 2004, acknowledges this and recommends that healthcare teams ensure accurate and timely evaluation of spiritual issues through regular assessment. This reflects the increasing emphasis on spirituality as a factor contributing to wellbeing and coping strategies.1-4 A proliferation of textbooks and book chapters with titles containing the word “spirituality” seek to elucidate what spiritual care is, how it might be assessed, and how needs might be met.5 However, a lack of consensus remains as to what spirituality actually is.6 Some key words occur quite regularly in the various descriptions of spirituality in journals and textbooks (box). In health research we should differentiate between the terms spiritual and religious since, if they are used interchangeably, reports of spirituality may be describing religious practice and affiliation.7,8 These can be interrelated. Spiritual belief may or may not be religious, but most religious people will be spiritual. A non-religious person may still therefore have a deep spirituality and spiritual needs. Spiritual care is not just the facilitation of an appropriate ritual but engaging with an individual's search for existential meaning, as reflected in the existential domain of the McGill quality of life questionnaire.9 Variables such as religious practice often seem easier to measure. Where participants for research have drawn from communities where religious practice is at high levels, these studies have shown that participating actively in the life of the faith community seems to lead to better health profiles. Religion also strengthens people's ability to cope with life threatening disease,3,6,10 and its importance in predicting aspects of psychosocial need in patients with cancer has been reported.1 These studies are examining religious affiliation and behaviour even though some of them talk about spirituality. Recently researchers have begun to look at populations that may not be religious but claim to have a clear spiritual belief. King et al reported that 71% of people who entered their acute hospital study had an important spiritual belief, even though many did not express that in a religious way.8 Other studies confirm this proportion and are beginning to show the importance of spiritual belief in predicting clinical outcome,8 the management of death distress,11 end of life despair,2 and assessing quality of life in oncology patients.9,12 Evidence is growing that spiritual belief and religious practice are important predictive factors for a larger proportion of people entering health care than previously thought. Many may benefit from support for this aspect of their life. A need exists for user friendly and brief measures to assess spiritual need in the absence of religious faith, so that it may be addressed properly rather than as some general panacea which is assumed to be good but is not individually tailored. Only in this way may we “ensure that the spiritual elements of disease are taken into account,” as recommended in the guidance from NICE. Key words and phrases in spirituality literature Meaning—making sense of life situations; deriving purpose from existence Existential—searching for personal meaning within one's life, death, and concerns about freedom and isolation Value—cherished beliefs and standards of, for example, truth, beauty, behaviour, or thoughts Transcendence—appreciation of dimension beyond self; creating ability to rise above “here and now” experience Connecting—relationships and communication with self, others, environment, higher power, the sacred Becoming—links to identity, personal growth, through reflection on life experience Coping—means of using or developing strategies in critical life events; achieving inner peace Spirituality—the search for existential or ultimate meaning within a life experience, such as illness. (This belief usually refers to a power other than the self, which people may or may not describe as God, higher power, or forces within nature, and with which they communicate. The power helps the person to transcend the here and now, re-establish hope and the ability to cope) Religion—is an expression of spiritual belief through a framework of rituals, codes, and practices; the sense of otherness or a power being a deity or supreme being Philosophical—relates to the same searching, but with a rejection of any influential power external to the self

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.110
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.382 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations104
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJSame topicReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyFrench-language works237,207