Lymphocytes from spontaneously hypertensive rats exhibit enhanced adenylyl cyclase-Gi protein signaling
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
OBJECTIVE: We have previously demonstrated an augmented activation of Gialpha proteins in heart and aorta from spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs), which was attributed to an enhanced expression of Gialpha proteins. Since immortalized lymphoblasts derived from lymphocytes of hypertensive patients have been shown to have enhanced Gi activation, the present studies were undertaken to investigate if lymphocytes from SHRs also exhibit enhanced Gi activation and whether this activation is related to enhanced expression of Gi proteins. METHODS: The levels of G-proteins and mRNA were determined by immunoblotting and Northern blotting techniques, using specific antibodies and cDNA probes, respectively. Adenylyl cyclase activity stimulated or inhibited by agonists was determined to examine the functions of G-proteins. RESULTS: The levels of Gialpha-2, Gialpha-3, Gbeta but not of Gs(alpha45) and Gs(alpha47) were significantly increased in lymphocytes from SHRs as compared to their control Wistar Kyoto (WKY) rats. Similarly the mRNA levels of Gialpha-2 and Gialpha-3 were significantly augmented in SHRs as compared to their age-matched WKYs. The increased levels of Gialpha were reflected in increased functions of Gi in SHRs as indicated by increased inhibition of forskolin-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity by GTPgammaS. The activity of adenylyl cyclase stimulated by GTPgammaS, isoproterenol, NECA, NaF and forskolin was significantly decreased in SHRs as compared to their age-matched WKY rats. On the other hand, inhibitory hormones, atrial natriuretic peptide and angiotensin II inhibited adenylyl cyclase activity to a greater extent in SHRs as compared to their age-matched WKY rats. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that lymphocytes from spontaneously hypertensive rats exhibit enhanced Gi activation (function) which may be attributed to the enhanced expression of Gi proteins. It may be suggested that enhanced Gi expression and associated signaling may be one of the factors responsible for enhanced lymphoblasts proliferation observed in hypertension.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».