Lymphocytes from spontaneously hypertensive rats exhibit enhanced adenylyl cyclase-Gi protein signaling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We have previously demonstrated an augmented activation of Gialpha proteins in heart and aorta from spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs), which was attributed to an enhanced expression of Gialpha proteins. Since immortalized lymphoblasts derived from lymphocytes of hypertensive patients have been shown to have enhanced Gi activation, the present studies were undertaken to investigate if lymphocytes from SHRs also exhibit enhanced Gi activation and whether this activation is related to enhanced expression of Gi proteins. METHODS: The levels of G-proteins and mRNA were determined by immunoblotting and Northern blotting techniques, using specific antibodies and cDNA probes, respectively. Adenylyl cyclase activity stimulated or inhibited by agonists was determined to examine the functions of G-proteins. RESULTS: The levels of Gialpha-2, Gialpha-3, Gbeta but not of Gs(alpha45) and Gs(alpha47) were significantly increased in lymphocytes from SHRs as compared to their control Wistar Kyoto (WKY) rats. Similarly the mRNA levels of Gialpha-2 and Gialpha-3 were significantly augmented in SHRs as compared to their age-matched WKYs. The increased levels of Gialpha were reflected in increased functions of Gi in SHRs as indicated by increased inhibition of forskolin-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity by GTPgammaS. The activity of adenylyl cyclase stimulated by GTPgammaS, isoproterenol, NECA, NaF and forskolin was significantly decreased in SHRs as compared to their age-matched WKY rats. On the other hand, inhibitory hormones, atrial natriuretic peptide and angiotensin II inhibited adenylyl cyclase activity to a greater extent in SHRs as compared to their age-matched WKY rats. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that lymphocytes from spontaneously hypertensive rats exhibit enhanced Gi activation (function) which may be attributed to the enhanced expression of Gi proteins. It may be suggested that enhanced Gi expression and associated signaling may be one of the factors responsible for enhanced lymphoblasts proliferation observed in hypertension.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".