After Camp: Portraits in Midcentury Japanese American Life and Politics by Greg Robinson (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: After Camp: Portraits in Midcentury Japanese American Life and Politics by Greg Robinson Nancy Kang (bio) After Camp: Portraits in Midcentury Japanese American Life and Politics, by Greg Robinson. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2012. Viii + 328 pp. $29.95 paper. ISBN 978-0-5202-7159-3. Readers who approach Greg Robinson’s After Camp: Portraits in Midcentury Japanese American Life and Politics hoping for a collection of Issei and Nisei survivor stories will be sorely disappointed. Only the third chapter (“Japantown Born and Reborn”), a triangulation of case studies based on resettlement experiences in New York, Detroit, and Los Angeles, inclines in that direction. There are, however, no sustained personal perspectives. Those seeking a non-chronological, “broad-based investigation” (2) of Japanese American pre- and postincarceration life will be gratified by the scope and conscientiousness of this ambitious historical project. After Camp resembles a patchwork quilt of discrete yet cohesive pieces. Divided thematically into five sections, the twelve chapters tackle such diverse issues as President Roosevelt’s plans for postwar resettlement and dispersal of former internees; the negotiation of citizenship values by Nisei (second-generation) intellectuals, politicians, artists, and activist collectives like the Japanese American Citizenship League (JACL); the imperatives of assimilation amid public mistrust and discrimination; and the pre- and postwar connections forged among Japanese Americans, Mexican Americans, and African Americans. There is no core thesis to be proven so much as a multidirectional reconstruction of the cultural milieus into which the former “enemy aliens” found themselves released and expected to thrive. Robinson’s writing is eminently readable, with ample examples conveyed in an accessible yet erudite style that would appeal to general readers as well as fellow historians. Particularly strong are the chapters devoted to the “uneasy” [End Page 104] and “fragile” alliance between African Americans and Japanese Americans from the mid-1950s onward (217). The author traces the evolution of black–Asian solidarity based on common experiences of oppression such as media-fueled racism, housing discrimination, and restricted access to schooling, employment, and property ownership. Robinson deftly calls attention to the precedent-setting cooperation between the JACL and the Legal Defense Fund of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP). Discussing Brown v. Board of Education (1954) in the context of Korematsu v. United States (1944) and Oyama v. California (1948), he expertly underscores how Japanese American legal struggles laid the foundation for postwar civil rights legislation at the national level. The author then dissects frictions that arose between the two groups as the 1960s progressed. Attitudes ranging from avoidance and indifference to “bitter disdain” (226) characterized Nisei reactions to African American civil rights agitation. Others remained loyal to the spirit of camaraderie and mutual striving. Challenges were exacerbated by model minority discourses in the media that pitted assimilated, seemingly unobtrusive Asian Americans against “troublemaking” racial Others. Added to the fray were disagreements over controversial legislation like California’s Proposition 14 (on housing discrimination based on race and religion) and the fallout from the Watts Riots of 1965. This urban upheaval resulted in significant damage to Nisei-owned businesses and corroded the spirit of intergroup dialogue and cooperation. Overall, these incidents acted to diminish the closeness that had germinated decades earlier when, in the wake of Executive Order 9066, a “disproportionate” amount of support was offered by black intellectuals and communities for their Japanese American compatriots (157). Although African American institutional leadership remained largely silent on the matter, voices such as Harvard-educated lawyer Hugh E. Macbeth, writers George Schuyler and Langston Hughes, singer Paul Robeson, reporter Erna P. Harris, and attorney Pauli Murray challenged the long-held misconception that these two populations were largely uninvolved in each other’s historical strivings (161). Robinson’s inquiries whet the scholarly appetite for further investigation on this underexamined topic. In the spirit of crossing barriers, boundaries, and borders, this U.S.-born Canadian academic displays a refreshingly hemispheric approach to the preand postwar struggles of the internees. He does not omit commentary on Japanese Canadian incarceration and also focuses an entire chapter on the career of McGill University sociologist Forrest LaViolette, whom he describes as a political “paradox” (4) and “weak reed in...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».