Canada and the Great War: Western Front Association Papers (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Canada and the Great War: Western Front Association Papers Ian M. Brown Canada and the Great War: Western Front Association Papers. Edited by Briton C. Busch. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2003. ISBN 0-7735-2570-X. Maps. Photographs. Notes. Pp. xi, 240. $22.95. This anthology is the product of the September 2001 Western Front Association's Ottawa Seminar and, as with all such works, is a mixed bag. The work is comprised of twelve chapters that cover a wide range of topics, all of which influenced Canada's efforts in the Great War (First World War). The chapters are an interesting and at times eclectic mix of popular and scholarly history. Three in particular should attract the attention of military historians. First, Patrick Brennan provides a fascinating study of Brigadier General William Griesbach's evolution as a military commander learning his craft on the western front. By 1918 Griesbach had become a skilled and successful practitioner of the art of command. Brennan makes one observation in particular, that "some of the problems of open warfare were insurmountable with the technology available in 1918" (p. 89), which should be adopted as a maxim by anyone who studies the Great War. Second, Roger Sarty argues persuasively that the naval cooperation between Canada, Great Britain, and the United States in the northwest [End Page 1275] Atlantic helped lay the groundwork for the greatly increased scale of cooperation in the Second World War. American assistance to the Royal Canadian Navy proved of critical importance in spite of its small scale because the RCN needed all the additional antisubmarine assets that it could lay its hands on. Finally, Syd Wise provides a study of the BEF's Amiens offensive that is a corrective to the "Teutonophile" school of thought prevalent in the United States, which believes that the German army provided nearly all examples of innovation on the western front. Regarding the well-known, indeed lionized, Colonel Georg Bruchmüller, Wise states accurately, "it is in fact the case that German artillery innovations were preceded by similar innovations in both the British and French armies, yet so pronounced is the predilection among many historians to believe in the superiority of German methods that these innovations have been largely ignored" (p. 195). This chapter should be read by anyone who studies the Great War. W. David Parsons's overview of Newfoundland's experience in the war provided a pleasant surprise—Newfoundland's Great War experience is often overlooked because it did not join the Canadian confederation until 1949. Owen Cooke's study of Canadian airmen in the allied intervention in Russia is another interesting study of a largely ignored event. Clearly, the Seminar organizers made a considerable effort to highlight lesser known events or experiences. At the same time, it is unfortunate that none of the papers examined the Francophone experience. The very nature of the war's impact on Canada—on the one hand creating in Anglophone Canadians a sense of national identity heretofore absent, while simultaneously triggering the 1917 conscription crisis that nearly split the county apart—means that the lack of a Francophone example makes the work seem incomplete. This absence notwithstanding, Canada and the Great War is well worth reading. Ian M. Brown Coventry Health Care, Inc. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Copyright © 2004 Society for Military History
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».