MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076388894 · doi:10.1353/jmh.2004.0174

Canada and the Great War: Western Front Association Papers (review)

2004· article· en· W2076388894 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ian M. Brown

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Military History · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFront (military)CraftHistoryNavyQueen (butterfly)Spanish Civil WarArt historyMedia studiesClassicsArchaeologySociologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Canada and the Great War: Western Front Association Papers Ian M. Brown Canada and the Great War: Western Front Association Papers. Edited by Briton C. Busch. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2003. ISBN 0-7735-2570-X. Maps. Photographs. Notes. Pp. xi, 240. $22.95. This anthology is the product of the September 2001 Western Front Association's Ottawa Seminar and, as with all such works, is a mixed bag. The work is comprised of twelve chapters that cover a wide range of topics, all of which influenced Canada's efforts in the Great War (First World War). The chapters are an interesting and at times eclectic mix of popular and scholarly history. Three in particular should attract the attention of military historians. First, Patrick Brennan provides a fascinating study of Brigadier General William Griesbach's evolution as a military commander learning his craft on the western front. By 1918 Griesbach had become a skilled and successful practitioner of the art of command. Brennan makes one observation in particular, that "some of the problems of open warfare were insurmountable with the technology available in 1918" (p. 89), which should be adopted as a maxim by anyone who studies the Great War. Second, Roger Sarty argues persuasively that the naval cooperation between Canada, Great Britain, and the United States in the northwest [End Page 1275] Atlantic helped lay the groundwork for the greatly increased scale of cooperation in the Second World War. American assistance to the Royal Canadian Navy proved of critical importance in spite of its small scale because the RCN needed all the additional antisubmarine assets that it could lay its hands on. Finally, Syd Wise provides a study of the BEF's Amiens offensive that is a corrective to the "Teutonophile" school of thought prevalent in the United States, which believes that the German army provided nearly all examples of innovation on the western front. Regarding the well-known, indeed lionized, Colonel Georg Bruchmüller, Wise states accurately, "it is in fact the case that German artillery innovations were preceded by similar innovations in both the British and French armies, yet so pronounced is the predilection among many historians to believe in the superiority of German methods that these innovations have been largely ignored" (p. 195). This chapter should be read by anyone who studies the Great War. W. David Parsons's overview of Newfoundland's experience in the war provided a pleasant surprise—Newfoundland's Great War experience is often overlooked because it did not join the Canadian confederation until 1949. Owen Cooke's study of Canadian airmen in the allied intervention in Russia is another interesting study of a largely ignored event. Clearly, the Seminar organizers made a considerable effort to highlight lesser known events or experiences. At the same time, it is unfortunate that none of the papers examined the Francophone experience. The very nature of the war's impact on Canada—on the one hand creating in Anglophone Canadians a sense of national identity heretofore absent, while simultaneously triggering the 1917 conscription crisis that nearly split the county apart—means that the lack of a Francophone example makes the work seem incomplete. This absence notwithstanding, Canada and the Great War is well worth reading. Ian M. Brown Coventry Health Care, Inc. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Copyright © 2004 Society for Military History

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.563
Threshold uncertainty score0.868

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.020
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Military HistorySame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207