MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2076864685 · doi:10.3992/jgb.5.4.78

Prospecting for Silver Striking Platinum: Our First LEED Project

2010· article· en· W2076864685 sur OpenAlex
James MacGillivray, Gregory T Hicks, Steve Adams, Sue Barnett, Bryan Bobrick, David P. Graham, Morgan Royce, Rick Weber, Greg Miller, James Wernicke

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Green Building · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineDecision Sciences
ThématiqueConstruction Project Management and Performance
Établissements canadiensResponse Biomedical (Canada)
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésProspectingArchitectural engineeringPlatinumEngineeringEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental economicsMining engineeringEconomicsChemistry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Prospecting demands positive future orientation, hope, sometimes not even knowing what it is you might discover. We were hopeful prospectors on our first LEED project, not exactly sure what we might strike. We sought silver sustainability for the University of New Mexico (UNM) College of Education Building (COE); what we discovered was even more precious and rare, platinum. Getting there entailed chipping away at each sustainable LEED credit until we hit pay dirt, the first publicly-funded and second LEED Platinum building in New Mexico. Gregory T. Hicks & Associates P.C. Architects was contracted by UNM to design a LEED Silver Certified building for its new COE Administration and Classroom Building, Phase 1. All new, state-funded buildings in New Mexico must achieve a minimum LEED Silver certification as mandated by Governor's Executive Order. Two of our staff, Jim MacGillivray and Jay Davis, are LEED APs, and our Principal, Gregory T. Hicks, has taken several USGBC courses, but this being our first LEED project, we participated in additional study in LEED certification and sustainable design. We also hired an experienced sustainable design specialist to serve as our LEED AP, our lead prospector, Susan Barnett. Not knowing how easy or difficult it might be to achieve LEED Silver, the prudent approach was to strive for as many points as possible, so that if we lost a few points along the way we would still fulfill the obligations of our contract. UNM COE and other UNM staff championed this approach. Our initial strategy targeted LEED credits with minimal cost, those almost free, logical modifications that improve sustainability. Next, we focused on achieving four “Innovation in Design” credits, searching for ideas that would involve minor costs or creative design endeavor. UNM COE committed to a photovoltaic system for educational and research purposes as well as to purchase a renewable energy certificate. Our initial venture targeted up to 48 possible points, comfortably within Gold territory. We submitted our project to USGBC for design review as the project went out to bid. The design review denied a few points in some areas, but serendipitously awarded a few extra points in other areas. UNM COE supported the prospects of achieving Gold so we provided additional information to successfully appeal denied credits, which brought us back up to a potential of 48 points, assuming targeted points were awarded during the construction review. At this point we knew we would certainly achieve Silver, possibly Gold. Midway through construction, the COE Dean, Richard Howell, and COE Chief of Staff, Diane Gwinn, asked us if there might be a way to earn just 4 or more points to reach the 52 required for LEED Platinum. Steve Chavez, UNM Project Manager, strongly championed this effort. This seemed difficult, if not impossible at this juncture in the project, but we met with COE, UNM engineers, design engineers, LEED AP, and the contractor to brainstorm possibilities. We came up with eight possibilities, but not all were affordable, practical, or supported, so we whittled the eight down to five, but just before the construction review we lost one of the five, so we tried for four. When the USGBC completed their construction review, we learned we had scored 52 points awarded LEED Platinum certification. Partnership of UNM COE, architect, engineers, LEED APs, and contractor created this success through a relentless “can-do” attitude throughout the project, plus some luck. Boring down deeply, we sought Silver and struck Platinum. This narrative is organized according to the USGBC LEED credit rating system and highlights the sustainable accomplishments of the project along with lessons learned.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,820
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,425

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,100
Tête enseignante GPT0,404
Écart entre enseignants0,304 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle