Smart Ball: Marketing the Myth and Managing the Reality of Major League Baseball (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Smart Ball: Marketing the Myth and Managing the Reality of Major League Baseball Jeff Obermeyer Robert F. Lewis II . Smart Ball: Marketing the Myth and Managing the Reality of Major League Baseball. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi, 2010. 165 pp. Cloth, $50.00. In Smart Ball, Robert F. Lewis II examines the ways that Major League Baseball exercises soft and hard power to further its business interests, and how [End Page 175] the nature and use of that power changes over time as MLB seeks a more global reach. In the opening chapter, Lewis introduces the term power; following Joseph S. Nye Jr., Lewis defines power as "the ability to influence the behavior of others to get the outcomes one wants" (4). Power is subdivided into hard power, involving the use of threats and inducements, and soft power, which relies upon attraction. The coordinated use of hard power and soft power to achieve one's aims is referred to as smart power, and this concept is the foundation of Lewis's thesis that "smart power appears to be an improved means for both preserving MLB's challenged position as the national pastime in a diverse United States and enhancing the country's role in a global market" (8). Lewis's argument is developed in four chapters, each devoted to the uses of power that defined specific eras in MLB history. "Baseball as a Sport: Creating Power" follows the development of the early game, as well as the process of creating baseball's mythical origins, and the use of that mythos in establishing the game as the national pastime. "Baseball as a Domestic Monopoly: Developing Power" details MLB owners' early reliance on hard power to build and control their businesses, and the subsequent shift that took place as the players increased their power in the business relationship. Lewis also discusses the shared challenges faced by owners and players in the wake of the recent steroid scandal. In "Baseball as a Neocolonialist: Abusing Power," MLB's history of race relations is examined, both domestically and internationally. Players represent a combination of labor and material resources in the baseball business, while MLB operates as a neocolonial power attempting to develop and, more importantly, control these resources. "Baseball as a Global Business: Balancing Power" details the shift, currently in progress, of baseball changing from a neocolonial power to a global business, one that seeks to partner with its peers in other countries for the mutual benefit of all. Lewis brings everything full circle in the final chapter, integrating his concepts and outlining nine strategies for MLB to employ in its quest to establish baseball as a global sport and the league as a truly global business. Lewis's nine strategies reflect both his understanding of global business principles and how MLB can apply these principles to benefit domestic and international perceptions of baseball. A few factual errors were identified, though these appear limited to a handful of paragraphs about baseball cards. Black Jack gum did not introduce the baseball card in 1870 (43), and, in fact, the Standard Catalog of Baseball Cards contains no nineteenth-century references to Black Jack gum. The famous T206 Honus Wagner card is described as being issued in the 1890s (44), when it in fact dates from 1909-11, and Lewis states that the highest price ever paid [End Page 176] for a football card is $10,000 (44), though at least two dozen individual cards have sold in excess of that price in recent years, with at least one selling for more than $200,000. Further fact-checking did not reveal any other errors, however, and those identified did not detract from or contradict Lewis's assertions. Overall, Lewis successfully integrates baseball history and MLB's business practices into a geopolitical economic model. While the first decades of MLB as a business were owner-dominated and stable, the overreliance on hard power actually caused the league to stagnate and hindered development. Racial integration and the slowly growing power of the players forced owners to be take a more global view, but it took time for them to move past the traditional hard power approach to a...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,020 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».