MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2077425528 · doi:10.1353/nin.2011.0021

Smart Ball: Marketing the Myth and Managing the Reality of Major League Baseball (review)

2011· article· en· W2077425528 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jeff Obermeyer

Bibliographic record

VenueNine · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmerican Sports and Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeaguePower (physics)Soft powerMarketingManagementPolitical sciencePoliticsLawEconomicsBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Smart Ball: Marketing the Myth and Managing the Reality of Major League Baseball Jeff Obermeyer Robert F. Lewis II . Smart Ball: Marketing the Myth and Managing the Reality of Major League Baseball. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi, 2010. 165 pp. Cloth, $50.00. In Smart Ball, Robert F. Lewis II examines the ways that Major League Baseball exercises soft and hard power to further its business interests, and how [End Page 175] the nature and use of that power changes over time as MLB seeks a more global reach. In the opening chapter, Lewis introduces the term power; following Joseph S. Nye Jr., Lewis defines power as "the ability to influence the behavior of others to get the outcomes one wants" (4). Power is subdivided into hard power, involving the use of threats and inducements, and soft power, which relies upon attraction. The coordinated use of hard power and soft power to achieve one's aims is referred to as smart power, and this concept is the foundation of Lewis's thesis that "smart power appears to be an improved means for both preserving MLB's challenged position as the national pastime in a diverse United States and enhancing the country's role in a global market" (8). Lewis's argument is developed in four chapters, each devoted to the uses of power that defined specific eras in MLB history. "Baseball as a Sport: Creating Power" follows the development of the early game, as well as the process of creating baseball's mythical origins, and the use of that mythos in establishing the game as the national pastime. "Baseball as a Domestic Monopoly: Developing Power" details MLB owners' early reliance on hard power to build and control their businesses, and the subsequent shift that took place as the players increased their power in the business relationship. Lewis also discusses the shared challenges faced by owners and players in the wake of the recent steroid scandal. In "Baseball as a Neocolonialist: Abusing Power," MLB's history of race relations is examined, both domestically and internationally. Players represent a combination of labor and material resources in the baseball business, while MLB operates as a neocolonial power attempting to develop and, more importantly, control these resources. "Baseball as a Global Business: Balancing Power" details the shift, currently in progress, of baseball changing from a neocolonial power to a global business, one that seeks to partner with its peers in other countries for the mutual benefit of all. Lewis brings everything full circle in the final chapter, integrating his concepts and outlining nine strategies for MLB to employ in its quest to establish baseball as a global sport and the league as a truly global business. Lewis's nine strategies reflect both his understanding of global business principles and how MLB can apply these principles to benefit domestic and international perceptions of baseball. A few factual errors were identified, though these appear limited to a handful of paragraphs about baseball cards. Black Jack gum did not introduce the baseball card in 1870 (43), and, in fact, the Standard Catalog of Baseball Cards contains no nineteenth-century references to Black Jack gum. The famous T206 Honus Wagner card is described as being issued in the 1890s (44), when it in fact dates from 1909-11, and Lewis states that the highest price ever paid [End Page 176] for a football card is $10,000 (44), though at least two dozen individual cards have sold in excess of that price in recent years, with at least one selling for more than $200,000. Further fact-checking did not reveal any other errors, however, and those identified did not detract from or contradict Lewis's assertions. Overall, Lewis successfully integrates baseball history and MLB's business practices into a geopolitical economic model. While the first decades of MLB as a business were owner-dominated and stable, the overreliance on hard power actually caused the league to stagnate and hindered development. Racial integration and the slowly growing power of the players forced owners to be take a more global view, but it took time for them to move past the traditional hard power approach to a...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.609
Threshold uncertainty score0.981

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNineSame topicAmerican Sports and LiteratureFrench-language works237,207