Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Orthopaedic trauma is a growing subspecialty that has its own unique problems. Although a substantial amount of data originates from North America, it is obvious that we are not alone in our struggles to improve patient care in our field. The Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma was started as a means to disseminate this information as an outgrowth of the newly formed Orthopaedic Trauma Association. Although the authors in the past have been predominantly North Americans, the readership has become more and more international in its distribution. Over the last 6 years, the Journal has fostered this relationship with the international community of traumatologists who regularly read our publication. Belgian, Japanese, Argentinian, and Canadian societies, as well as the International Society for Fracture Repair, have all made JOT their journal as well. Our goal has always been to develop a forum to answer questions and solve problems for physicians in our discipline of medicine, no matter where they may live. This issue of the Journal, then, marks a milestone for our publication. Seven scientific publications, one technique, and three case reports will be found in this issue. All of the scientific papers come from outside the U.S. and discuss a wide range of problems: forearm fractures (Italy), proximal humerus fractures (Turkey), spinal fractures (Israel), acetabular fractures (Sweden), knee dislocations (New Zealand), bone transport (South Korea), and issues with osteogenesis (England). The technique article and case reports originate from England, South Korea, and the U.S. The peer review process is blinded both to author and reviewer in our Journal. As any of you who have published in our Journal know, all manuscripts undergo a rigorous acceptance process, sometimes with multiple revisions, before that paper is finally ready for publication. The information in those accepted manuscripts must be useful and timely for the readership. Different countries experience different problems, and the solutions to those problems offer all our readers insights they may not have thought of in dealing with these issues. This is what makes an international forum so valuable. We applaud all of the authors from around the globe who submit manuscripts and have them published in our Journal. With this issue, the Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma has truly become the international journal it was always meant to be. As always, happy reading! FIGUREFigure
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,008 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle