South Asian Festivals on the Move ed. by Ute Hüsken Axel Michaels (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: South Asian Festivals on the Move ed. by Ute Hüsken Axel Michaels David Mason SOUTH ASIAN FESTIVALS ON THE MOVE. Edited by Ute Hüsken and Axel Michaels. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 2013. 431 pp. There are two special qualities of this volume that Ute Hüsken and Axel Michaels have edited. First, the majority of its contributors are writing in English as a second or third (but, in any case, not native) language. Second, the book’s topics include a number of festivals that are less known to Westerners. The value of the first quality is the glimpse it gives of “other” scholarship on otherwise familiar topics to those of us who rely on English. All the book’s essays are in English, but many have been translated or painstakingly composed in order to reach an audience beyond German-speaking scholars. The authors rely on some of the usual suspects of performance theory—Victor Turner, Clifford Geertz, and Erika Fischer-Lichte—as well as on some widely recognized specialists in South Asian performance—Bruce Sullivan, Phillip Zarrilli, and Farley Richmond. But mixed in with this familiar work is material that is no less important, if less known among scholars west of 30 degrees longitude, including Hanne M. de Bruin, Martin Baumann, and Jyotindra Jain. Taken as a whole, the volume offers a look at the current state of the field(s), across some less-traversed national and language borders. The value of the second quality is the way it brings some obscure, less-picked-over phenomena into the discussion of festival and religious activity in South Asia. There is, of course, the obligatory examination of the Kumbha [End Page 620] Mela (which, in this case, actually is refreshing in its attention to specific individuals who participated in the 2010 festival at Haridwar), and more than one contribution concerned with kutiyattam. But other topics include an infrequent multicultural festival in Nepal, a folk art festival in Delhi, and royal ceremonies conducted in the City Palace complex of Jaipur. Furthermore, the volume offers a look at the religious life of relatively small Tamil communities in Canada and Germany. Coexistence alongside better-known phenomena in this book gives some just elevation to these lesser-known events, practices, and communities in a region of genuinely great variation and diversity. The book is long—more than four hundred pages—but it reads quickly, and it wisely offers a preponderance of color photographs to help readers visualize the authors’ objects of study. In four parts, the volume’s fifteen essays examine the way festivals mediate between populations, global and local convergence in festivals, the implications on public life of festival processions, and South Asian festivals observed outside of South Asia. For the neophyte, the rather thick descriptions of festival-ritual activity in many of the articles, such as in editor Axel Michaels’s own treatment of the Dīpankara procession in Nepal, some meticulous ethnographies, such as Paul Younger’s assessment of certain Tamil communities in Canada, and detailed histories, such as Heike Moser’s digest of the course of kutiyattam, introduce South Asian religion in fine and comprehensive detail. A case in point is the opening essay by Eva Ambrose and William S. Sax, which provides a dense two-page history of the tooth relic that features in Sri Lanka’s annual Äsala festivals. Perhaps all the elements of this history are not necessary to the theoretical argument concerning the festivals that follows (asserting that the festivals’ activities create social relationships). But for a reader who is unfamiliar with these festivals and their featured object, the details in this historical narrative are both fascinating and a meaningful primer with regard to this region’s public religion. The bulk of the article that follows is a comprehensive description, in fine detail, of all the activities comprising two separate, and different, Äsala festivals. Many of the book’s remaining articles are similarly meticulous. Even the student or scholar with significant experience in South Asia will not have been directly exposed to the breadth of practices that the contributions to this book describe—often in minute detail. The authors’ attention to nuances, consequently, offer most...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».