MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2079276629 · doi:10.1353/atj.2014.0039

South Asian Festivals on the Move ed. by Ute Hüsken Axel Michaels (review)

2014· article· en· W2079276629 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David Mason

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Theatre Journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPhilippine History and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGermanScholarshipHistoryValue (mathematics)Art historyClassicsMedia studiesHumanitiesArtSociologyLawArchaeologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: South Asian Festivals on the Move ed. by Ute Hüsken Axel Michaels David Mason SOUTH ASIAN FESTIVALS ON THE MOVE. Edited by Ute Hüsken and Axel Michaels. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 2013. 431 pp. There are two special qualities of this volume that Ute Hüsken and Axel Michaels have edited. First, the majority of its contributors are writing in English as a second or third (but, in any case, not native) language. Second, the book’s topics include a number of festivals that are less known to Westerners. The value of the first quality is the glimpse it gives of “other” scholarship on otherwise familiar topics to those of us who rely on English. All the book’s essays are in English, but many have been translated or painstakingly composed in order to reach an audience beyond German-speaking scholars. The authors rely on some of the usual suspects of performance theory—Victor Turner, Clifford Geertz, and Erika Fischer-Lichte—as well as on some widely recognized specialists in South Asian performance—Bruce Sullivan, Phillip Zarrilli, and Farley Richmond. But mixed in with this familiar work is material that is no less important, if less known among scholars west of 30 degrees longitude, including Hanne M. de Bruin, Martin Baumann, and Jyotindra Jain. Taken as a whole, the volume offers a look at the current state of the field(s), across some less-traversed national and language borders. The value of the second quality is the way it brings some obscure, less-picked-over phenomena into the discussion of festival and religious activity in South Asia. There is, of course, the obligatory examination of the Kumbha [End Page 620] Mela (which, in this case, actually is refreshing in its attention to specific individuals who participated in the 2010 festival at Haridwar), and more than one contribution concerned with kutiyattam. But other topics include an infrequent multicultural festival in Nepal, a folk art festival in Delhi, and royal ceremonies conducted in the City Palace complex of Jaipur. Furthermore, the volume offers a look at the religious life of relatively small Tamil communities in Canada and Germany. Coexistence alongside better-known phenomena in this book gives some just elevation to these lesser-known events, practices, and communities in a region of genuinely great variation and diversity. The book is long—more than four hundred pages—but it reads quickly, and it wisely offers a preponderance of color photographs to help readers visualize the authors’ objects of study. In four parts, the volume’s fifteen essays examine the way festivals mediate between populations, global and local convergence in festivals, the implications on public life of festival processions, and South Asian festivals observed outside of South Asia. For the neophyte, the rather thick descriptions of festival-ritual activity in many of the articles, such as in editor Axel Michaels’s own treatment of the Dīpankara procession in Nepal, some meticulous ethnographies, such as Paul Younger’s assessment of certain Tamil communities in Canada, and detailed histories, such as Heike Moser’s digest of the course of kutiyattam, introduce South Asian religion in fine and comprehensive detail. A case in point is the opening essay by Eva Ambrose and William S. Sax, which provides a dense two-page history of the tooth relic that features in Sri Lanka’s annual Äsala festivals. Perhaps all the elements of this history are not necessary to the theoretical argument concerning the festivals that follows (asserting that the festivals’ activities create social relationships). But for a reader who is unfamiliar with these festivals and their featured object, the details in this historical narrative are both fascinating and a meaningful primer with regard to this region’s public religion. The bulk of the article that follows is a comprehensive description, in fine detail, of all the activities comprising two separate, and different, Äsala festivals. Many of the book’s remaining articles are similarly meticulous. Even the student or scholar with significant experience in South Asia will not have been directly exposed to the breadth of practices that the contributions to this book describe—often in minute detail. The authors’ attention to nuances, consequently, offer most...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.942
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian Theatre JournalSame topicPhilippine History and CultureFrench-language works237,207