Fortune’s a River: The Collision of Empires in Northwest America (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Fortune’s a River: The Collision of Empires in Northwest America Robin Fisher Fortune’s a River: The Collision of Empires in Northwest America. Barry Gough. Madeira Park: Harbour, 2007. Pp. 416, $36.95 Barry Gough has a long track record of publication on the maritime history of the northwest coast. Well known for his books on the royal navy on the coast and his work on Alexander Mackenzie and other explorers, Gough’s Fortune’s a River is a synthesis by a historian at the [End Page 329] top of his game who knows the time and place that he is writing about really well. It is an account of how the interests of Britain and America, along with sidebar activity by Spain and Russia, contested for political and commercial control over the northwest. The prize was control over the Columbia River, the outlet to, and the access from, the Pacific. The story was often one of British initiatives prompting American responses. It begins with John Ledyard, who was with Cook on the third voyage when it put in at Nootka, and who, on his return, tried to quicken American interest in the potential of the northwest coast. After the trip of Alexander Mackenzie, the first to cross the continent by land, Thomas Jefferson expressed the American interest by, among other things, sending Lewis and Clark to find a way to the Pacific. They were the first to reach the mouth of the Columbia, while David Thompson dallied upriver in the interior, as he was more concerned with accurate mapping and relations with the Native people than with driving hard to the coast. Throughout all this probing by land, the Russians and the Spanish were hovering to the north and south on the coast ready, but not always able, to assert their competing interests. Gough’s argument is that these early explorers were the forerunners of empire and that they established initial claims, sometimes literally with a stake in the ground, through their courage and endurance. But, as he also notes, it took strong commercial interests backed by political and military power to make these initial claims stick. The Americans established a tenuous toehold at Fort Astoria, only to be ousted by the much more aggressive and better organized Northwest Company. The Northwest Company later morphed into the Hudson Bay Company and it continued to manage commercial development around the mouth of the Columbia until the arrival of American settlers marked the beginning of the end of British control. The forces that had been set in motion by Alexander Mackenzie, countered by Jefferson and represented by Lewis and Clark, were realized by the establishment of the forty-ninth parallel as the international boundary from the Rockies to the Pacific by the Treaty of Oregon in 1846. In the end, the Americans were more convinced and determined, and so control of the river of fortune fell to them. As Gough tells it, the story does bounce around a fair bit and, since it follows interests rather than chronology, there is a certain amount of repetition and referencing back and forth in the text. It might be confusing to a reader coming to this history for the first time. The book is also somewhat overwritten, tending to use more words where fewer would do. Contrary to the jacket notes, it is not written like the [End Page 330] ‘wild west adventures’ that I read, being at the opposite end of the writing spectrum to, say, Cormac McCarthy. The contribution of the book is that it gathers the various strands of interest and exploration together and, in that, it is a significant addition to literature on the history of the European exploration of the northwest. Robin Fisher Mount Royal College Copyright © 2009 University of Toronto Press Incorporated
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,009 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».