MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2079597415 · doi:10.1353/can.0.0172

Fortune’s a River: The Collision of Empires in Northwest America (review)

2009· article· en· W2079597415 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Robin Fisher

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Historical Review · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsHistoryNavyArchaeologyShoreGeographyOceanographyLawPolitical scienceGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Fortune’s a River: The Collision of Empires in Northwest America Robin Fisher Fortune’s a River: The Collision of Empires in Northwest America. Barry Gough. Madeira Park: Harbour, 2007. Pp. 416, $36.95 Barry Gough has a long track record of publication on the maritime history of the northwest coast. Well known for his books on the royal navy on the coast and his work on Alexander Mackenzie and other explorers, Gough’s Fortune’s a River is a synthesis by a historian at the [End Page 329] top of his game who knows the time and place that he is writing about really well. It is an account of how the interests of Britain and America, along with sidebar activity by Spain and Russia, contested for political and commercial control over the northwest. The prize was control over the Columbia River, the outlet to, and the access from, the Pacific. The story was often one of British initiatives prompting American responses. It begins with John Ledyard, who was with Cook on the third voyage when it put in at Nootka, and who, on his return, tried to quicken American interest in the potential of the northwest coast. After the trip of Alexander Mackenzie, the first to cross the continent by land, Thomas Jefferson expressed the American interest by, among other things, sending Lewis and Clark to find a way to the Pacific. They were the first to reach the mouth of the Columbia, while David Thompson dallied upriver in the interior, as he was more concerned with accurate mapping and relations with the Native people than with driving hard to the coast. Throughout all this probing by land, the Russians and the Spanish were hovering to the north and south on the coast ready, but not always able, to assert their competing interests. Gough’s argument is that these early explorers were the forerunners of empire and that they established initial claims, sometimes literally with a stake in the ground, through their courage and endurance. But, as he also notes, it took strong commercial interests backed by political and military power to make these initial claims stick. The Americans established a tenuous toehold at Fort Astoria, only to be ousted by the much more aggressive and better organized Northwest Company. The Northwest Company later morphed into the Hudson Bay Company and it continued to manage commercial development around the mouth of the Columbia until the arrival of American settlers marked the beginning of the end of British control. The forces that had been set in motion by Alexander Mackenzie, countered by Jefferson and represented by Lewis and Clark, were realized by the establishment of the forty-ninth parallel as the international boundary from the Rockies to the Pacific by the Treaty of Oregon in 1846. In the end, the Americans were more convinced and determined, and so control of the river of fortune fell to them. As Gough tells it, the story does bounce around a fair bit and, since it follows interests rather than chronology, there is a certain amount of repetition and referencing back and forth in the text. It might be confusing to a reader coming to this history for the first time. The book is also somewhat overwritten, tending to use more words where fewer would do. Contrary to the jacket notes, it is not written like the [End Page 330] ‘wild west adventures’ that I read, being at the opposite end of the writing spectrum to, say, Cormac McCarthy. The contribution of the book is that it gathers the various strands of interest and exploration together and, in that, it is a significant addition to literature on the history of the European exploration of the northwest. Robin Fisher Mount Royal College Copyright © 2009 University of Toronto Press Incorporated

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Historical ReviewSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207