Effect of Isolation of Periosteum and Dura on the Healing of Rabbit Calvarial Inlay Bone Grafts
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Little is understood about the role of the recipient site in the revascularization and incorporation of autogenous inlay bone grafts in the craniofacial skeleton. Clinical experience demonstrates that secondary complex cranial vault reconstruction performed with scarred avascular dura or poor soft-tissue coverage may undergo significant resorption, thus compromising the aesthetic outcome. This study was designed to determine the effect of isolating autogenous orthotopic inlay calvarial bone grafts from the surrounding dura and/or periosteum on graft revascularization, healing, and volume maintenance in the adult rabbit. Adult rabbits were randomized into four groups (n = 10 per group); in each rabbit, the authors created a circular, 15-mm in diameter, full-thickness cranial defect followed by reconstruction with an autogenous calvarial bone graft, which was replaced orthotopically and held with microplate fixation. Silicone sheeting (0.5 mm thickness) was used to isolate the dura (group II), the periosteum (group II), or both dura and periosteum (group IV) from the graft interface. No silicone was placed in group I. Animals were killed 10 weeks postoperatively, and calvaria were harvested to assess graft surface area, morphology, quantitative histology, fluorochrome staining, and revascularization. Grafts isolated from both the dura and periosteum exhibited significant decreases in total bone (cortical and trabecular) surface area, blood vessel count, and interface healing compared with nonisolated control grafts. Isolation of either the dura or periosteum significantly (p < 0.05) decreased blood vessel count but had no significant effect on interface healing. Isolation of the dura alone was associated with a significant (p < 0.05) decrease in graft cross-sectional surface area and dural cortical thickness compared with nonisolated control grafts, but this effect was not observed when the periosteum alone was isolated. Quantitative histology performed 10 weeks after surgery indicated that graft isolation was associated with increased marrow fibrosis and necrosis compared with nonisolated controls; it also demonstrated evidence of increased activity in bone remodeling (osteoblast and osteocyte count, new trabecular bone, and surface resorption). Triple fluorochrome staining suggested increased bone turnover in the nonisolated grafts compared with isolated grafts at 1 and 5 weeks postoperatively. This study demonstrates that isolating a rabbit calvarial inlay autogenous bone graft from the dura and/or periosteum results in significantly (p < 0.05) decreased revascularization, interface healing, and cross-sectional areas of amount of mature bone compared with nonisolated control grafts 10 weeks after surgery. At this time point, histologic examination demonstrates a paradoxical increase in bone remodeling in isolated bone grafts compared with controls. It is possible that the inhibition of revascularization results in a delayed onset of the remodeling phase of graft incorporation. However, in the model studied, it is not known whether the quantitative histologic and morphometric parameters measured in these isolated grafts exhibit a "catch-up" phenomenon at time points beyond 10 weeks after surgery. The results of this study emphasize the importance of a healthy recipient site in the healing and incorporation of calvarial bone grafts but stress the need for further investigation at later time points.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».