Effect of Isolation of Periosteum and Dura on the Healing of Rabbit Calvarial Inlay Bone Grafts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Little is understood about the role of the recipient site in the revascularization and incorporation of autogenous inlay bone grafts in the craniofacial skeleton. Clinical experience demonstrates that secondary complex cranial vault reconstruction performed with scarred avascular dura or poor soft-tissue coverage may undergo significant resorption, thus compromising the aesthetic outcome. This study was designed to determine the effect of isolating autogenous orthotopic inlay calvarial bone grafts from the surrounding dura and/or periosteum on graft revascularization, healing, and volume maintenance in the adult rabbit. Adult rabbits were randomized into four groups (n = 10 per group); in each rabbit, the authors created a circular, 15-mm in diameter, full-thickness cranial defect followed by reconstruction with an autogenous calvarial bone graft, which was replaced orthotopically and held with microplate fixation. Silicone sheeting (0.5 mm thickness) was used to isolate the dura (group II), the periosteum (group II), or both dura and periosteum (group IV) from the graft interface. No silicone was placed in group I. Animals were killed 10 weeks postoperatively, and calvaria were harvested to assess graft surface area, morphology, quantitative histology, fluorochrome staining, and revascularization. Grafts isolated from both the dura and periosteum exhibited significant decreases in total bone (cortical and trabecular) surface area, blood vessel count, and interface healing compared with nonisolated control grafts. Isolation of either the dura or periosteum significantly (p < 0.05) decreased blood vessel count but had no significant effect on interface healing. Isolation of the dura alone was associated with a significant (p < 0.05) decrease in graft cross-sectional surface area and dural cortical thickness compared with nonisolated control grafts, but this effect was not observed when the periosteum alone was isolated. Quantitative histology performed 10 weeks after surgery indicated that graft isolation was associated with increased marrow fibrosis and necrosis compared with nonisolated controls; it also demonstrated evidence of increased activity in bone remodeling (osteoblast and osteocyte count, new trabecular bone, and surface resorption). Triple fluorochrome staining suggested increased bone turnover in the nonisolated grafts compared with isolated grafts at 1 and 5 weeks postoperatively. This study demonstrates that isolating a rabbit calvarial inlay autogenous bone graft from the dura and/or periosteum results in significantly (p < 0.05) decreased revascularization, interface healing, and cross-sectional areas of amount of mature bone compared with nonisolated control grafts 10 weeks after surgery. At this time point, histologic examination demonstrates a paradoxical increase in bone remodeling in isolated bone grafts compared with controls. It is possible that the inhibition of revascularization results in a delayed onset of the remodeling phase of graft incorporation. However, in the model studied, it is not known whether the quantitative histologic and morphometric parameters measured in these isolated grafts exhibit a "catch-up" phenomenon at time points beyond 10 weeks after surgery. The results of this study emphasize the importance of a healthy recipient site in the healing and incorporation of calvarial bone grafts but stress the need for further investigation at later time points.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".