MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2081050000 · doi:10.1353/esc.0.0169

Truth, Reconciliation, and Amnesia: Porcupines and China Dolls and the Canadian Conscience

2009· article· en· W2081050000 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Keavy Martin

Notice bibliographique

RevueEnglish studies in Canada · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésConscienceCasualBattlePsychoanalysisNarrativeAmnesiaHistoryBlamePsychologyLiteratureArtSociologyCriminologyLawPolitical sciencePsychiatryAncient history

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Truth, Reconciliation, and Amnesia: Porcupines and China Dolls and the Canadian Conscience Keavy Martin (bio) The events of the workshop again made the news that afternoon.... In one week, Chief David, James and Jake would be known all over the NWT. In two weeks, they would be forgotten. Robert Arthur AlexiePorcupines and China Dolls In Robert Arthur Alexie’s 2002 novel Porcupines and China Dolls, three former residential school students shock the fictional hamlet of Aberdeen, nwt, when they disclose the sexual abuse they suffered as young boys under the care of the institution. The people have gathered this day for a healing workshop to address the suffering that alcohol has been causing in their community; the rising action of the novel is devoted to describing this dysfunction, as the narrative follows the main character, James Nathan, through his daily routine of drinking, casual sex, and suicide attempts. But when James and his friends Jake and David—now in their forties—finally put a name to the nightmares that haunt them, they begin the process of taking control of their lives and ending the cycles of abuse. As David says to the assembled people: “I’m tired of runnin’. This is where it ends. Right here ‘n right now. This is where we make the change for ourselves ‘n for our children. I will run no more!” (198). [End Page 47] The characters’ attempts to “face their demons” then becomes literalized, and what follows is an almost-apocalyptic battle scene, as beady-eyed, reeking demons begin to crawl out of the walls and ceiling. The men become Warriors; they grow to impossible heights, and their voices are so mighty that “the roof of the community hall blew off and scattered to the four winds” (204). Armed suddenly with lances and swords, they take their bloody revenge on the “demons, dreams and nightmares” that have been tormenting them (196). The community joins in the epic struggle, and in an orgy of pop-culture references, the victims of residential schools are re-empowered: James Nathan was like a knight in shining armour. He was like Kevin Costner in Dances With Wolves. He was like Crazy Horse charging into battle. He was like Geronimo at his best. Young girls dreamed of marrying him. Young boys dreamed of becoming him. Elders dreamed they were him and cried for the good old days. (205) Alexie’s readers will recognize this scene as the cathartic climax of the healing narrative—even if it is hyperbolic beyond even what Sophocles could imagine. By finally telling their stories in a public setting, the victims seem to have purged themselves of the hurt that has already claimed many lives in Aberdeen. As one of the elder women has told them, “It’s gettin’ rid of it through talkin’ ‘n cryin’ that’s gonna help you. If you don’t get rid of it, it’ll kill you like it’s done to so many of our People” (105). After the battle is over, a cool, cleansing wind sweeps through the hall, and the people soon begin to mark the re-emergence of some of their traditions: they travel out onto the land to carry the body of an abused former student to the Old People—cremating him in the old way—and after decades of obeying the Church’s regulations, they witness the return of the drum. Trough storytelling, ceremony, and song, the people stitch their community back together again. It comes as a surprise, then, when James wakes up the morning after his disclosure and has the following exchange with his girlfriend: “You okay?” Brenda asked. “Yeah,” he lied. He got up and made coffee. Snow. “Whatcha gonna do today?” she asked. “Check for caribou.” Maybe blow my brains out too. “You?” (219) [End Page 48] Despite the climactic events of the previous day, things seem to have returned to normal. Sure enough, only a few pages later, James attempts suicide again, and he will try it several more times before the novel ends. The event of the community’s “healing,” after all, occurs only two-thirds of the way through the book, and rather than arriving...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,050
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,363

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,007
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0200,039
Communication savante0,0060,004
Science ouverte0,0020,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,006
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0070,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,237
Écart entre enseignants0,225 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations23
Publié2009
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEnglish studies in CanadaMême sujetCanadian Identity and HistoryTravaux en français237 207