MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2081057259 · doi:10.1080/02722011.2013.769017

Religiosity in Canada and the United States: Diverging Paths

2013· article· en· W2081057259 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Martin N. Marger

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe American Review of Canadian Studies · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueReligion and Society Interactions
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésReligiositySecularizationImmigrationDivergence (linguistics)SociologyWelfare stateExistentialismEuropean Social SurveySociology of religionWelfarePositive economicsDemographic economicsPolitical economyPolitical scienceSocial scienceEconomicsLawPolitics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Comparing degrees of religiosity, Canada and the US have been moving along divergent trajectories for the past several decades. Regional variations are evident in both societies, but, taken as a whole, the divergence holds up even when these intrasocietal differences are accounted for. Neither the classic secularization thesis nor the more popular religious economy model in the sociology of religion adequately explain the contemporary disparities in religious practice and belief in the two societies. More compelling explanations lie in human security and welfare state models. Canadian and US demographic patterns, particularly internal differences among recent immigrants, are additional explanatory factors. Levels of existential security and immigration trends in the two societies are likely to sustain the divergence in religiosity. Keywords: religiositysecularizationimmigrationCanadaUS Notes 1. Lipset's work was a striking exception. 2. Some have interpreted the 40 percent figure as inflated, the product of over-reporting of a socially desirable activity (Chaves and Stephens, Citation2003). Even allowing for a somewhat lower percentage, however, Americans' church attendance remains markedly higher than that of almost all other Western societies. 3. The strength of evangelical Protestantism and political conservatism in Alberta obscures the fact that on some key measures of religiosity Alberta is actually well below the Canadian average. Only in BC do more people claim no religious affiliation (Statistics Canada, 2001), and a smaller percentage attend church than in any province except BC and Quebec (Clark, Citation2000). 4. Marci McDonald (Citation2011) argues that Christian nationalism has covertly taken a firm hold on the Harper government and is beginning to influence public policies and the makeup of the Cabinet. Should this trend become more transparent, it would not refute the current level of religiosity in Canada. Even in the US, the high political profile of religiously-based groups and organizations in recent decades has not produced a societal shift in most measures of religiosity. 5. It is true nonetheless that the church–state relationship in Canada has historically been stronger, at least until the mid-nineteenth century, and the society less religiously differentiated than the US (Beyer, Citation1997; Noll, 1992). 6. Norris and Inglehart (Citation2011) posit that, in addition to existential security, the predominant religious beliefs, values, and practices in any society are rooted in long-standing cultural traditions and histories. This religious culture serves as an adjunct to economic factors shaping the strength of religiosity. Noll (1992) suggests that because the US has historically been more religiously diffuse than Canada, it has been able to absorb secularizing changes with fewer changes in patterns of church attendance. Lipset (Citation1996) also points to the historically decentralized nature of US religion as contributing to the ability of churches to adapt to change. Moreover, divided religious loyalties—Protestant and Catholic—remained a fundamental aspect of Canadian society. This led to a very muted idea of the nation's covenant with God, in sharp contrast to the US, where the notion of "chosen people" became a customary proclamation, central to American civil religion. As Bellah (Citation1967, 7) describes it, "[God] is actively interested and involved in history, with a special concern for America." 7. Although the US, compared to other Western societies, has been a welfare state laggard in providing poor relief and social insurance, it has been a consistent leader in providing mass education. Garfinkel, Rainwater, and Smeeding (Citation2010) suggest that the dominance of Protestantism is in some part an explanation. 8. This model, in effect, links the three most evident remaining characteristics of the American exceptionalist idea, as were suggested earlier. 9. Also, the Asian American population contains a large and growing segment of those who declare no religious identity or connection (Kosmin and Keysar, Citation2009; Pew Forum, 2012), and it is reasonable to assume that Asian immigrants will continue that trend. Again, it is important to consider the diverse communities of this racial-ethnic category and the range of beliefs they bring to the American scene. 10. Using data from Statistics Canada's General Social Survey and the 2002 Ethnic Diversity Survey, and applying a four-item religiosity index, Clark and Schellenberg (Citation2006) found a somewhat higher level of religiosity among immigrants generally compared to the Canadian-born, but found a wide range when immigrants were disaggregated. South and Southeast Asians were highest among all groups, including the Canadian-born, and East Asians and Europeans lowest. 11. In a study of immigrant children, Kasinitz et al. (Citation2009) found their sample (limited to New York City) to be less religious than other Americans.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,424
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,423

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,307
Écart entre enseignants0,285 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations5
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe American Review of Canadian StudiesMême sujetReligion and Society InteractionsTravaux en français237 207