Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Comparing degrees of religiosity, Canada and the US have been moving along divergent trajectories for the past several decades. Regional variations are evident in both societies, but, taken as a whole, the divergence holds up even when these intrasocietal differences are accounted for. Neither the classic secularization thesis nor the more popular religious economy model in the sociology of religion adequately explain the contemporary disparities in religious practice and belief in the two societies. More compelling explanations lie in human security and welfare state models. Canadian and US demographic patterns, particularly internal differences among recent immigrants, are additional explanatory factors. Levels of existential security and immigration trends in the two societies are likely to sustain the divergence in religiosity. Keywords: religiositysecularizationimmigrationCanadaUS Notes 1. Lipset's work was a striking exception. 2. Some have interpreted the 40 percent figure as inflated, the product of over-reporting of a socially desirable activity (Chaves and Stephens, Citation2003). Even allowing for a somewhat lower percentage, however, Americans' church attendance remains markedly higher than that of almost all other Western societies. 3. The strength of evangelical Protestantism and political conservatism in Alberta obscures the fact that on some key measures of religiosity Alberta is actually well below the Canadian average. Only in BC do more people claim no religious affiliation (Statistics Canada, 2001), and a smaller percentage attend church than in any province except BC and Quebec (Clark, Citation2000). 4. Marci McDonald (Citation2011) argues that Christian nationalism has covertly taken a firm hold on the Harper government and is beginning to influence public policies and the makeup of the Cabinet. Should this trend become more transparent, it would not refute the current level of religiosity in Canada. Even in the US, the high political profile of religiously-based groups and organizations in recent decades has not produced a societal shift in most measures of religiosity. 5. It is true nonetheless that the church–state relationship in Canada has historically been stronger, at least until the mid-nineteenth century, and the society less religiously differentiated than the US (Beyer, Citation1997; Noll, 1992). 6. Norris and Inglehart (Citation2011) posit that, in addition to existential security, the predominant religious beliefs, values, and practices in any society are rooted in long-standing cultural traditions and histories. This religious culture serves as an adjunct to economic factors shaping the strength of religiosity. Noll (1992) suggests that because the US has historically been more religiously diffuse than Canada, it has been able to absorb secularizing changes with fewer changes in patterns of church attendance. Lipset (Citation1996) also points to the historically decentralized nature of US religion as contributing to the ability of churches to adapt to change. Moreover, divided religious loyalties—Protestant and Catholic—remained a fundamental aspect of Canadian society. This led to a very muted idea of the nation's covenant with God, in sharp contrast to the US, where the notion of "chosen people" became a customary proclamation, central to American civil religion. As Bellah (Citation1967, 7) describes it, "[God] is actively interested and involved in history, with a special concern for America." 7. Although the US, compared to other Western societies, has been a welfare state laggard in providing poor relief and social insurance, it has been a consistent leader in providing mass education. Garfinkel, Rainwater, and Smeeding (Citation2010) suggest that the dominance of Protestantism is in some part an explanation. 8. This model, in effect, links the three most evident remaining characteristics of the American exceptionalist idea, as were suggested earlier. 9. Also, the Asian American population contains a large and growing segment of those who declare no religious identity or connection (Kosmin and Keysar, Citation2009; Pew Forum, 2012), and it is reasonable to assume that Asian immigrants will continue that trend. Again, it is important to consider the diverse communities of this racial-ethnic category and the range of beliefs they bring to the American scene. 10. Using data from Statistics Canada's General Social Survey and the 2002 Ethnic Diversity Survey, and applying a four-item religiosity index, Clark and Schellenberg (Citation2006) found a somewhat higher level of religiosity among immigrants generally compared to the Canadian-born, but found a wide range when immigrants were disaggregated. South and Southeast Asians were highest among all groups, including the Canadian-born, and East Asians and Europeans lowest. 11. In a study of immigrant children, Kasinitz et al. (Citation2009) found their sample (limited to New York City) to be less religious than other Americans.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».