MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2081534840 · doi:10.1353/nin.2012.0013

Dixie Walker: A Life in Baseball , and: Carl Furillo, Brooklyn Dodgers All-Star (review)

2012· article· en· W2081534840 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Robert A. Moss

Notice bibliographique

RevueNine · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueAmerican Sports and Literature
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésArt historyArtPerformance artHistoryCartographyGeography

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Dixie Walker: A Life in Baseball, and: Carl Furillo, Brooklyn Dodgers All-Star Robert A. Moss Lyle Spatz. Dixie Walker: A Life in Baseball. Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 2011. 273 pp. Paper, $29.95. Ted Reed. Carl Furillo, Brooklyn Dodgers All-Star. Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 2011. 210 pp. Paper, $29.95. From 1939 to 1957, right field at Ebbets Field was mostly the preserve of Dixie Walker and his successor, Carl Furillo, the two best right fielders in Brooklyn Dodgers history; both were .300 hitters who sprayed line drives in all directions, were dangerous in the clutch, and superior on defense. Furillo, nicknamed “The Reading Rifle,” had the best arm in the league, and both he and Walker fielded tricky caroms off the scoreboard and screen with the aplomb of billiards masters. Two biographies of Walker and one of Furillo have recently appeared. Lyle Spatz’s Dixie Walker: A Life in Baseball and Ted Reed’s Carl Furillo, Brooklyn Dodgers All-Star are reviewed here. Dixie Walker of the Dodgers: The People’s Choice, by Maury Allen with Susan Walker, was reviewed by Steve Gietschier in the Fall 2011 issue of NINE. Of the two Walker biographies, Allen’s, written with Dixie’s daughter, is richer in Walker’s off-the-field life, whereas Spatz’s volume hews closely to Dixie’s baseball career. Spatz and Reed each offer clearly written, serviceable biographies, providing needed redress for the reputations of two fine, underappreciated players. Both volumes are filled with details of baseball in the 1940s and 1950s, years in which Larry MacPhail, Branch Rickey, and Walter O’Malley built the Dodgers into the National League’s dominant team. Though we revere the “Boys of Summer,” Spatz demonstrates that we should not discount their “fathers,” the Dodgers who won pennants in 1941 and 1947, while finishing a close second to St. Louis in 1942 and 1946. In 1946, the Cardinals defeated the Dodgers in the first three-game playoff, as Branch Rickey’s old team beat Branch Rickey’s new team. Thereafter, the new team would triumph. Spatz describes the tortuous path Dixie Walker followed to the Dodgers. [End Page 125] Born in Georgia in 1910 and raised in Alabama, Dixie played minor-league baseball from 1928 to 1931 in Birmingham; Albany, Georgia; and Greensville, South Carolina, where he batted .401 and was purchased by the Yankees. They sent him to Jersey City, and later to Ft. Lauderdale, Toledo, and Toronto. In 1932, with the Newark Bears, Walker batted .350 with 15 HR and 105 RBI as the Bears won the International League championship. Finally with the Yankees in 1933, Walker was billed as Babe Ruth’s eventual successor in right field. However, a series of shoulder and arm injuries wiped out most of his 1933–1935 seasons. With the arrival of Joe DiMaggio in 1936, Walker’s usefulness to the Yankees ended. He was sold to the Chicago White Sox, and then to the Tigers, before he was finally claimed on waivers by Larry MacPhail for the Dodgers in 1939. Walker later said, “All I knew about Brooklyn was that it was some strange outer world. . . . I didn’t know what on God’s great earth to expect” (57). Yet it was in Brooklyn that he blossomed. Playing mostly center field in 1940 and moving to right with the arrival of Pete Reiser in 1941, Dixie endeared himself to the Flatbush faithful by hitting .308 in 1940 (including an average of .435 against the hated Giants) and striking out only 21 times in 605 plate appearances. This performance level continued in 1941 (.316), and in 1944 Walker won the NL batting title with a .357 average. Although wartime pitching was depleted, Walker surpassed Stan Musial by ten points. Walker also endeared himself to Brooklyn fans off the field. A reporter for the New York Daily Mirror wrote, “He has never turned down a request to make an appearance at a Holy Name Society rally, an Epworth League meeting or a Bar Mitzvah” (151). Red Barber summed up why the fans loved Dixie—“he was a castoff, retread, human” (191). Dixie avowed that in Brooklyn he had known “the finest...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,061
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,203

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0030,003
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0610,038

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,228
Écart entre enseignants0,210 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2012
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNineMême sujetAmerican Sports and LiteratureTravaux en français237 207