Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Contemporary Antisemitism: Canada and the World Gordon Dueck (bio) Derek Penslar, Michael Marrus, and Janice Gross Stein, editors. Contemporary Antisemitism: Canada and the World University of Toronto Press. 130. $45.00 This book is the outcome of a conference held in February 2003 at the University of Toronto's Munk Centre for International Studies. Its theme: the 'new anti-Semitism.' Despite what is implied in the book's title, Canada was not the centripetal focus of discussion. No overarching attempt was made to connect what has been happening in Canada – e.g., the United Talmud Torah bombing in Montreal – to developments worldwide, or vice versa. McGill University sociologist Morton Weinfeld was the lone scholar to address the matter of anti-Semitism, new and old, within the Canadian context, and he did so with his usual combination of rigour and good sense. The other contributors were free to range far afield. Todd Endelman discussed the contemporary – and, in his view, precarious – situation of Jews in Western Europe. (Coeditor Michael Marrus's response to Endelman is not included here; it was taped and televised by tv Ontario, along with most of the proceedings.) Historian Steven Zipperstein explored the problem of distinguishing between political prejudice against Israel and anti-Jewish bigotry. The Left's present position on Israel vis-à-vis Palestine, for example, is based primarily on an idealistic, Manichaean understanding of the current geopolitical situation and not on myth or superstition. Therefore, according to Zipperstein, opposition to Israel should not be automatically conflated with anti-Semitism in the 'classic' sense, though there are times when this is entirely appropriate. In any case, motives matter. Derek Penslar supplied the introduction as well as a thoughtful essay on the history of Arab and Islamic attitudes towards Israel. Mark Tessler provided evidence based on polls taken in the last decade that served to confirm Penslar's conclusion: unlikely as it seems now, an 'accommodation [End Page 610] between Israel and the Arab world' is achievable, if only because anti-Semitism in the Middle East tends to 'grow out of a political conflict in which Jews are empowered actors, not figments of the imagination.' Arab anti-Zionism is 'rational' insofar as it waxes and wanes depending on the policies and actions of the Jewish state. In other words, there is the possibility of dialogue and for a fair peace, eventually. Finally, it should be mentioned that, apart from scholars, there were also two prominent Canadian public officials invited to speak at the Munk Centre. Chief Justice Roy McMurtry recounted his years in office as Ontario's attorney-general (1975–1985), a time when the emergence of neo-Nazis, such as Ernst Zundel, challenged the state to take an active hand in combating hate; and, most notably, the conference opened with an address by former prime minister Brian Mulroney. The editors generously describe the latter's contribution as 'historic.' That may be overstating the case: there is nothing particularly historic about a Conservative politician pointing out the sins of his Liberal predecessors; on the other hand, it is true that William Lyon Mackenzie King's anti-Semitic and pro-Hitlerite sentiments deserve public attention and continued denunciation. Mulroney's speech aside, it is historically significant that in his capacity as prime minister he did appoint three Jews in succession – Stanley Hartt, Norman Spector, and Hugh Segal – to serve as chief of staff, and that he went on to give Spector the Canadian ambassadorship to Israel, 'smashing the odious myth of dual loyalties that had prevented Jews from serving in that position for forty years.' Although uneven in quality, as are most publications stemming from conference papers, this slim volume demonstrates that there were moments at the Munk Centre worth preserving in print. Perhaps next time the conference and the publication that follows will include examples of the kind of dialogue between Arabs and Jews most of the participants agreed is possible and of mutual benefit. Then again, recent events in Lebanon may preclude this from happening anytime soon. Gordon Dueck Gordon Dueck, Department of History, Queen’s University Copyright © 2007 University of Toronto Press Incorporated
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,020 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,009 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».