Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reviewed by: Contemporary Antisemitism: Canada and the World Gordon Dueck (bio) Derek Penslar, Michael Marrus, and Janice Gross Stein, editors. Contemporary Antisemitism: Canada and the World University of Toronto Press. 130. $45.00 This book is the outcome of a conference held in February 2003 at the University of Toronto's Munk Centre for International Studies. Its theme: the 'new anti-Semitism.' Despite what is implied in the book's title, Canada was not the centripetal focus of discussion. No overarching attempt was made to connect what has been happening in Canada – e.g., the United Talmud Torah bombing in Montreal – to developments worldwide, or vice versa. McGill University sociologist Morton Weinfeld was the lone scholar to address the matter of anti-Semitism, new and old, within the Canadian context, and he did so with his usual combination of rigour and good sense. The other contributors were free to range far afield. Todd Endelman discussed the contemporary – and, in his view, precarious – situation of Jews in Western Europe. (Coeditor Michael Marrus's response to Endelman is not included here; it was taped and televised by tv Ontario, along with most of the proceedings.) Historian Steven Zipperstein explored the problem of distinguishing between political prejudice against Israel and anti-Jewish bigotry. The Left's present position on Israel vis-à-vis Palestine, for example, is based primarily on an idealistic, Manichaean understanding of the current geopolitical situation and not on myth or superstition. Therefore, according to Zipperstein, opposition to Israel should not be automatically conflated with anti-Semitism in the 'classic' sense, though there are times when this is entirely appropriate. In any case, motives matter. Derek Penslar supplied the introduction as well as a thoughtful essay on the history of Arab and Islamic attitudes towards Israel. Mark Tessler provided evidence based on polls taken in the last decade that served to confirm Penslar's conclusion: unlikely as it seems now, an 'accommodation [End Page 610] between Israel and the Arab world' is achievable, if only because anti-Semitism in the Middle East tends to 'grow out of a political conflict in which Jews are empowered actors, not figments of the imagination.' Arab anti-Zionism is 'rational' insofar as it waxes and wanes depending on the policies and actions of the Jewish state. In other words, there is the possibility of dialogue and for a fair peace, eventually. Finally, it should be mentioned that, apart from scholars, there were also two prominent Canadian public officials invited to speak at the Munk Centre. Chief Justice Roy McMurtry recounted his years in office as Ontario's attorney-general (1975–1985), a time when the emergence of neo-Nazis, such as Ernst Zundel, challenged the state to take an active hand in combating hate; and, most notably, the conference opened with an address by former prime minister Brian Mulroney. The editors generously describe the latter's contribution as 'historic.' That may be overstating the case: there is nothing particularly historic about a Conservative politician pointing out the sins of his Liberal predecessors; on the other hand, it is true that William Lyon Mackenzie King's anti-Semitic and pro-Hitlerite sentiments deserve public attention and continued denunciation. Mulroney's speech aside, it is historically significant that in his capacity as prime minister he did appoint three Jews in succession – Stanley Hartt, Norman Spector, and Hugh Segal – to serve as chief of staff, and that he went on to give Spector the Canadian ambassadorship to Israel, 'smashing the odious myth of dual loyalties that had prevented Jews from serving in that position for forty years.' Although uneven in quality, as are most publications stemming from conference papers, this slim volume demonstrates that there were moments at the Munk Centre worth preserving in print. Perhaps next time the conference and the publication that follows will include examples of the kind of dialogue between Arabs and Jews most of the participants agreed is possible and of mutual benefit. Then again, recent events in Lebanon may preclude this from happening anytime soon. Gordon Dueck Gordon Dueck, Department of History, Queen’s University Copyright © 2007 University of Toronto Press Incorporated
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.020 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".