Mister Paradise and Other One-Act Plays, and: Candles to the Sun (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Mister Paradise and Other One-Act Plays, and: Candles to the Sun Brian Parker Tenessee Williams . Mister Paradise and Other One-Act Plays. Ed. Nicholas Moschovakis and David Roessel. Foreword Eli Wallach and Anne Jackson. New York: New Directions, 2005. Pp. xxxvi + 244. $15.95 (Pb). Tennessee Williams . Candles to the Sun. Ed. and Intro. Dan Isaac. Foreword William Jay Smith. New York: New Directions, 2004. Pp. xxxii + 117. $12.95 (Pb). One of the most interesting aspects of the recent surge in Tennessee Williams studies and performance has been the discovery of previously unpublished and, in some cases, unproduced plays from the early years of his career, before the debacle of Battle of Angels and The Glass Menagerie's success. The most spectacular of these recovered texts has been Not about Nightingales, a play concerning a prison scandal in 1938 that was edited by Allean Hale for New Directions in 1998 and immediately snapped up for very successful productions in London's West End and Broadway. Nightingales was one of five full-length plays known to have been performed during Williams' apprentice years, three more of which – Spring Storm, Stairs to the Roof, and Fugitive Kind (not to be confused with the film version of Battle of Angels) – have subsequently been published by New Directions and have received university productions. Candles to the Sun, which is the earliest of the five and almost certainly Williams' first full-length play, is now also available, edited by Dan Isaac, with a very interesting foreword by William Jay Smith, one of Williams' close friends from that period, who later became Poet Laureate of the United States. The play was begun at Memphis in the summer of 1935 as Williams recovered from a nervous breakdown [End Page 137] caused by his work at the International Shoe Company and was first performed in the auditorium of the Wednesday Club of St. Louis in March 1937, by a semi-professional company called the Mummers. The director of that group, Willard Holland, also played one of the leading roles – the charismatic union organizer Birmingham Red – and helped Williams shape the staged version of the play from a huge pile of typewritten pages of draft. A major difficultly in recovering all of these early works is Williams' maniacal method of composition. He was a speed typist who rarely planned what he was going to say but just jumped in and typed. As Dan Isaac explains in his textual notes for the edition, there are well over four-hundred pages of Candles to the Sun at the Humanities Research Center in Austin, Texas, representing drafts of at least four versions of the play, with The Lamp, Place in the Sun, and Candles in the Sun as alternative titles. Fortunately for Isaac, he was contacted as early as 1989 by Jane Garnett Carter, the actress who had created the role of the rebellious daughter Star, Williams' first female lead, who offered him a copy of the script as it was actually performed; and it is this script that has now been put into print, with a useful introduction and notes by Isaac, in addition to the foreword by Smith. Williams always had difficulty with plot construction, typically assembling his plays from discrete sections like a mosaic, so it is interesting to discover that he was enabled to make the leap from one-acts to a full-length play because Candles had originally been plotted by another playwright, Joseph Phelan Hollifield, who was a friend of Williams' grandfather. A title page for the version called The Lamp has both authors' names on it, plus a pencil note of explanation by Williams: "Hollifield finished the original one-act play from which the title and partly the idea of the play was derived. I am doing the writing on the present manuscript and he is contributing some material from Alabama." The exact extent of Hollifield's contribution to the full-length text performed in 1937 is unclear, but Isaac suggests that Williams wrote or rewrote most of the dialogue and I would speculate that what he probably developed most was the dynamics of a dysfunctional family, as distinct from the...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».